Hawaii Carpenters Trust Funds et al v. B&A Builders, Inc. et al, No. 1:2011cv00590 - Document 18 (D. Haw. 2012)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S AMENDED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 16 . Signed by JUDGE ALAN C KAY on 04/26/11. (eps) -- Grant Plaintiffs' Motion for Entry of Default Judgment Against B&A Builders, Inc.CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry

Download PDF
Hawaii Carpenters Trust Funds et al v. B&A Builders, Inc. et al Doc. 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) B&A BUILDERS, INC, ; JOHN ) DOES 1-100; JANE DOES 1-100; DOE CORPORATIONS 1-100; DOE ) ) PARTNERSHIPS 1-100; DOE ) ENTITIES 1-100; and DOE GOVERNMENTAL UNITS 1-100, ) ) ) Defendants. _____________________________ ) HAWAII CARPENTERS TRUST FUNDS et al., CIV. NO. 11-00590 ACK-RLP ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S AMENDED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Amended Findings and Recommendations having been filed and served on all parties via electronic notification on February 27, 2012 and via First Class Mail on February 28, 2012, and no objections having been filed by any party, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 74.2, the “Amended Findings and Recommendations to Grant Plaintiffs’ Motion for Entry of Default Judgment Against B&A Builders, Inc.” are adopted as the opinion and order of this Dockets.Justia.com Court.1 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, April 26, 2012. ________________________________ Alan C. Kay Sr. United States District Judge The Court notes that on page 13 of the Amended Findings and Recommendation, the magistrate judge correctly cited that Plaintiff’s attorney was requesting additional fees of $2,613.00, but erroneously cited that it was for 20.10 hours incurred; whereas, it was actually for an additional 13.40 hours. (See Doc. 15-1, Supplemental Declaration of Lorraine H. Akiba in Support of Plaintiff’s Findings and Recommendation to Grant Motion for Entry of Default Judgment Against B&A Builders Inc., Ex. A at 1.) 1

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.