-BMK Ramos et al v. U.S. National Bank N.A. et al, No. 1:2011cv00053 - Document 12 (D. Haw. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 11 . Signed by JUDGE HELEN GILLMOR on 6/17/2011. ~ (ecs, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on 6/20/2011.
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
-BMK Ramos et al v. U.S. National Bank N.A. et al Doc. 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII NICK RAMOS, an individual; ARCELYN RAMOS, an individual Plaintiffs, vs. U.S. National Bank, N.A., a Business Entity, form unknown, National City Mortgage, a Business Entity, form unknown; Alii Mortgage, a Business Entity, form unknown, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, a Business Entity, form unknown; and DOES 1-100 inclusive, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CV 11-00053 HG-BMK Defendants. _____________________________ ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 11) On May 5, 2011, an Order to Show Cause Hearing was held for Plaintiffs to show good cause why this case should not be dismissed for their failure to appear at the Rule 16 Scheduling Conference and Triage Conference, file a Scheduling Conference Statement, and prosecute this case. At the Order to Show Cause Hearing on May 5, 2011, Plaintiff Nick Ramos appeared by telephone. He indicated that Plaintiffs do not contest the Order to Show Cause. He also indicated that Plaintiffs do not wish to pursue the case and do not oppose dismissal of the case without prejudice. Findings and Recommendation that this Action be Dismissed Without Prejudice (Doc. 11) were filed on May 5, 2011. No Dockets.Justia.com objections have been filed by any party. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 74.2, the Findings and Recommendation (Doc. 11) are adopted as the opinion and order of this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: June 17, 2011, Honolulu, Hawaii. /S/ Helen Gillmor Helen Gillmor United States District Judge
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
