-BMK Trustees of the PAMCAH-UA Local 675 Trust Funds v. Blazemasters Fire Protection, LLC, No. 1:2010cv00422 - Document 11 (D. Haw. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 10 , re 7 Plaintiffs' Motion for Default Judgment Against Defendant Blazemasters Fire Protection, LLC. Signed by JUDGE DAVID ALAN EZRA on 12/9/10. (eps )CERTIFICA TE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications will be served by first class mail on 12/10/2010
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
-BMK Trustees of the PAMCAH-UA Local 675 Trust Funds v. Blazemasters Fire Protection, LLC Doc. 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII TRUSTEES OF THE PAMCAH-UA LOCAL 675 TRUST FUNDS (Reggie Castanares, Val Ceria, Robert M. Fernandez, Sam Fujikawa, Kent A. Matsuzaki, Gregg Serikaku and Mark K. Suzuki), by and through their Administrator, FRANCIS CHUN, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) BLAZEMASTERS FIRE ) PROTECTION, LLC, ) ) Defendant. ) _____________________________ ) CIVIL 10-00422-DAE-BMK ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION Findings and Recommendation having been filed and served on all parties on November 18, 2010, and no objections having been filed by any party, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 74.2, the “FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT BLAZEMASTERS FIRE Dockets.Justia.com PROTECTION, LLC, FILED OCTOBER 4, 2010,” document no. 10, are adopted as the opinion and order of this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, December 9, 2010. _____________________________ David Alan Ezra United States District Judge Trustees of the PAMCAH-UA LOCAL 675 TRUST FUNDS, et al. vs. Blazemasters Fire Protection, LLC, Civil No. 10-00422 DAE-KSC, ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
