-BMK Education, Department of, State of Hawaii v. J. et al, No. 1:2010cv00257 - Document 54 (D. Haw. 2012)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION re 53 . Signed by JUDGE A. WALLACE TASHIMA on 1/25/2012. ~ IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1)(C) and Lo cal Rule 74.2, the Findings and Recommendation That the Administrative Hearings Officer's Decision Be Reversed and the Case Be Remanded to the Administrative Hearings Officer are adopted as the opinion and order of this Court. (ecs, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry

Download PDF
-BMK Education, Department of, State of Hawaii v. J. et al Doc. 54 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, ) STATE OF HAWAI‘I, ) ) ) Plaintiff(s), ) ) vs. ) ) C.J., by and through his Parents, ) CRYSTAL AND TYLER J., ) ) Defendant(s). _____________________________ ) CV. NO. 10-00257 AWT-BMK ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION Findings and Recommendation having been filed and served on all parties on November 29, 2011, and no objections having been filed by any party, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 74.2, the “Findings and Recommendation That the Administrative Hearings Officer's Decision Be Reversed and the Case Be Remanded to the Administrative Hearings Officer” are adopted as the opinion and order of this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: January 25, 2012 /s/ A. Wallace Tashima A. Wallace Tashima United States Circuit Judge Sitting by Designation Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.