M. et al v. Education, Department of, State of Hawaii, No. 1:2009cv00163 - Document 23 (D. Haw. 2009)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 19 . Signed by JUDGE SAMUEL P KING on 9/23/09. ~ Findings and Recommendation that Plaintiffs Motion Determining Plaintiffs as Prevailing Party and for an Award of Attorneys Fees and Costs be Granted are adopted as the opinion and order of this Court. (ecs, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry

Download PDF

M. et al v. Education, Department of, State of Hawaii Doc. 23 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII ROSE M., by and through her ) Parents, LAURA and RICHARD M., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, ) STATE OF HAWAII, ) ) Defendant. ) _____________________________ ) CV 09-00163 SPK-BMK ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION A Findings and Recommendation was filed and served on all parties on 8/28/09. No objections have been filed. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rules 53.1, 53.2, and/or 74.2, the “Findings and Recommendation that Plaintiffs’ Motion Determining Plaintiffs as Prevailing Party and for an Award of Attorneys’ Fees and Costs be Granted” are adopted as the opinion and order of this Court. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, September 23, 2009. _____________________________ Samuel P. King Senior United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.