Black v. Correa et al, No. 1:2007cv00299 - Document 323 (D. Haw. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT OF SPECIAL MASTER 320 . Signed by JUDGE DAVID ALAN EZRA on 9/29/2010. ~ Pursuant to 28 USC § 636(b)(2) and Local Rule 53.1, the "AMENDMENT TO REPORT OF SPECIAL MASTER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ATTOR NEY FEES AND DEFENDANT'S OBJECTION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR COSTS" is adopted as the opinion and order of this court. ~ (afc)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive elec tronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Black v. Correa et al Doc. 323 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII SHARON BLACK, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) CITY AND COUNTY OF ) HONOLULU, ) ) Defendant. ) _____________________________ ) CIVIL NO. 07-00299 DAE-LEK ORDER ADOPTING REPORT OF SPECIAL MASTER An Amendment to the Report of Special Master having been filed on September 3, 2010, and served concurrently upon those counsel of record who are registered participants of CM/ECF, and served on September 7, 2010 by First Class Mail to those parties of record who are not registered participants of CM/ECF, and no objections having been filed by any party, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636 (b)(2) and Local Rule 53.1, the “AMENDMENT TO REPORT OF SPECIAL MASTER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR Dockets.Justia.com ATTORNEY FEES AND DEFENDANT'S OBJECTION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR COSTS,” document no. 320, is adopted as the opinion and order of this court. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, September 29, 2010. _____________________________ David Alan Ezra United States District Judge Sharon Black vs. City and County of Honolulu, Civil No. 07-00299 DAE-LEK; ORDER ADOPTING REPORT OF SPECIAL MASTER
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
