Williams v. United States of America, No. 5:2017cv00088 - Document 81 (S.D. Ga. 2019)

Court Description: ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendant's 61 Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant's Motion is GRANTED with respect to Count I. Defendant's Motion is DENIED with respect to Count II. Defendant's Daubert challe nge is DENIED, but Defendant may reurge it before trial. Defendant is GRANTED the opportunity to depose Dr. Hansen on the limited topic of Dr. Hansen's opinions set forth in his affidavit. Plaintiff's 78 Motion to Strike Defendant's Motion to Exclude Dr. Hansen's Affidavit Opinion As Time Barred by Court's Sixth Amended Scheduling Order is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 8/13/2019. (csr)

Download PDF
Williams v. United States of America Jin Doc. 81 ?l9ntteii States!IBts(tnct Cotttt for tl^e ^ontl^erti Biotrict of <l^eorgta ^apcrooo Idibtoton ESTHER WILLIAMS, Individually, and as Administrator of the Estate of PHILLIP WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, CV 5:17-088 V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. ORDER Before the Court are Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, dkt. no. 61, and Plaintiff's Motion to Strike, dkt. no. 78. Motions have been fully briefed and are ripe for review. The For the reasons provided below. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiff's Motion to Strike is DENIED as moot. BACKGROUND This action arises from the death of Phillip Williams (the ''Decedent") on July 3, 2014. Plaintiff alleges that Defendant committed due medical malpractice to many negligent acts or omissions that allegedly caused Decedent's death. A0 72A (Rev. 8/82) Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.