Schandolph v. Board of Regents, of the University System of Georgia et al, No. 4:2017cv00247 - Document 72 (S.D. Ga. 2019)

Court Description: ORDER granting 45 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 65 Motion to Strike. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 11/13/19. (wwp)
Download PDF
Schandolph v. Board of Regents, of the University System of Georgia et al Doc. 72 Fi: ^ U.S.OlST.vr^r: r i ' ^ IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOr '" THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORC^fi^ ^.'01/ (3 PH|2:L3 SAVANNAH DIVISION CLf: ' 'j.Tr. •. 0' HELEN SCHANDOLPH, Plaintiff, CASE NO. CV417-247 V. BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF GEORGIA, and JEANNE MCGOWAN, in her individual capacity. Defendants. ORDER Before the Court is Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 45) and Defendants' Motion to Strike or in the Alternative Notice of Objection and Brief in Support Thereof (Doc. 65). For the following reasons. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 45) is GRANTED and Defendants' Motion to Strike or in the Alternative Notice of Objection and Brief in Support Thereof (Doc. 65) is DENIED.1 ^ In their Motion to Strike, Defendants contend that Plaintiff's response to Defendants' Notice of Objection to Evidence was not timely under Southern District of Georgia Local Rule 7.5 and exceeds the brief length set forth in Southern District of Georgia Local Rule 7.1. (Doc. 65 at 2.) Defendants, therefore, request that this Court strike Plaintiff's responsive brief. The Court finds this to be unnecessary and finds that a reply brief from Defendants is also unnecessary. Accordingly, Defendants' Motion to Strike or in the Alternative Notice of Objection and Brief in Support Thereof (Doc. 65) is DENIED. Dockets.Justia.com