Clayton v. Savannah Chatham Metropolitan Police Department et al, No. 4:2015cv00093 - Document 48 (S.D. Ga. 2020)
Court Description: ORDER granting in part and denying in part re 26 Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part re 30 Motion to Dismiss. In addition to the claims that Plaintiff has abandoned see 45 , the Court has dismissed the following claims: (1) t he Equal Protection Clause claim, brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983, for sexual harassment against the City; (2) the 42 U.S.C. § 1981, through § 1983, claims for racial harassment/discrimination against Defendants Veal, Willis, and t he City; (3) the Title VI I claims for racial harassment/discrimination against the City; (4) the 42 U.S.C. § 1981, through § 1983, retaliation claim related to racial harassment/discrimination against Defendants Cutter, Robinson, and the City; and (5) the state law claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress against the City. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 2/5/2020. (loh)
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.