DiVito v. Lappin et al, No. 3:2008cv00087 - Document 22 (S.D. Ga. 2009)

Court Description: ORDER finding as moot 12 Motion ; adopting the 14 Report and Recommendations, dismissing Harvey Lappin as an impropery party Respondent, denying the peition, closing this civil aciton, and directing that a final judgment be entered in favor of Respondent Wells. Signed by Judge Dudley H. Bowen on 09/08/09. (thb)

Download PDF
DiVito v. Lappin et al Doc. 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ZO USSEP FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA - 8 PM 1 : 2 14 DUBLIN DIVISION MICHAEL DIIVITO, Petitioner, CV 308-087 V. WALT WELLS, Warden, et al., Respondents. ORDER After a carefull, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Therefore, Petitioner's pending requests to supplement his petition with additional authority and for a "case status report" are MOOT (doc. nos. 11-1, 12), Harvey Lappin is DISMISSED as an improper party Respondent, the petition is DENIED, this civil action is CLOSED, and a final judgment shall be ENTERED in favor of Respondent Wells. SO ORDERED thisofSept nhr (ThQ -At Aiicnietn UNITED STA DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.