Ingram Micro, Inc. v. Mindful eCycling LLC, No. 1:2017cv02549 - Document 94 (N.D. Ga. 2019)
Court Description: OPINION AND AND ORDER Granting Ingram Micro, Inc.'s 82 Seventh Motion in Limine to Bar Evidence and Testimony Regarding Previously Undisclosed Fact Witnesses. Signed by Judge Clarence Cooper on 12/18/19. (bjh)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Ingram Micro, Inc. v. Mindful eCycling LLC Doc. 94 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION INGRAM MICRO, INC., Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 1:17-CV-02549-CC vs. MINDFUL ECYCLING LLC, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff /Counterclaim Defendant Ingram Micro, Inc.’s (“Ingram Micro”) Seventh Motion in Limine to Bar Evidence and Testimony Regarding Previously Undisclosed Fact Witnesses. The Court, being duly advised on the premises, now GRANTS said Motion. The Court finds inadmissible any evidence or testimony concerning or related witnesses not properly or timely disclosed because doing so would prejudice Ingram Micro’s case. The Parties, counsel, and their witnesses may not refer to this evidence in the presence of the jurors or prospective jurors. -112778293v1 Dockets.Justia.com SO ORDERED, this 18th ___ day of _______________, 2019. December ______________________________ s/ CLARENCE COOPER CLARENCE COOPER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Submitted by: LEWIS WAGNER, LLP /s/ Aaron D. Grant A. Richard M. Blaiklock * Indiana Bar No. 20031-49 Aaron D. Grant * Indiana Bar No. 25594-59 * Admitted pro hac vice 501 Indiana Avenue, Suite 200 Indianapolis, IN 46202-6150 Telephone: (317) 237-0500 Facsimile: (317) 630-2790 Email: rblaiklock@lewiswagner.com agrant@lewiswagner.com HAWKINS PARNELL & YOUNG LLP /s/ Carl H. Anderson, Jr. Carl H. Anderson, Jr. Georgia Bar No. 016320 303 Peachtree Street, N.E., Suite 4000 Atlanta, Georgia 30308-3243 Telephone: 404) 614-7400 Telecopier: (404) 614-7500 E-mail: canderson@hpylaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Ingram Micro, Inc. -212778293v1
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
