Lee v. USP Atlanta's Warden, No. 1:2017cv02473 - Document 5 (N.D. Ga. 2018)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING the Magistrate Judge's 2 Final Report and Recommendation. For the reasons set forth in the R&R, Plaintiff's request for in forma pauperis status is DENIED and this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Orinda D. Evans on 4/3/2018. (sap)

Download PDF
Lee v. USP Atlanta's Warden Doc. 5 I N THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA D I V I S I O N APR 0 h 2 0 1 BRANDON CHE LEE Plaintiff C I V I L ACTION F I L E NO. 1:17-CV-2358-ODE-JFK V . USP ATLANTA'S WARDEN, a n d a l l of t h e s t a f f involved i n t h i s complaint, Defendant. BRANDON CHE LEE, C I V I L ACTION F I L E NO. 1:17-CV-2473-ODE-JFK Plaintiff, V. USP ATLANTA'S WARDEN, Defendant. ORDER These p r o se c i v i l a c t i o n s a r e b e f o r e t h e Court on t h e F i n a l R e p o r t a n d Recommendation o f U n i t e d S t a t e s M a g i s t r a t e Judge J a n e t F. King filed ("R&R"). February 2 7 , 2018 [Doc. 2 i n -2358; No o b j e c t i o n s have been f i l e d . I n t h e R&R, Judge K i n g recommends t h a t forma p a u p e r i s prejudice. status and t h a t Specifically, these Judge King d i s m i s s e d as f r i v o l o u s , that Plaintiff Plaintiff found that no i m m i n e n t Plaintiff, while a c t i o n s t h a t have been malicious, or f o r failure shows be d e n i e d i n a c t i o n s be d i s m i s s e d w i t h o u t i n c a r c e r a t e d , has f i l e d a t l e a s t t h r e e c i v i l and Doc. 3 i n -2473] threat t o state a claim, of serious physical injury. The Court having read and c o n s i d e r e d absence Of a n y o b j e c t i o n s t h e r e t o , t h e R&R a n d n o t i n g t h e i t i s ADOPTED as t h e o p i n i o n a n d Dockets.Justia.com order o f t h e Court. For t h e reasons set forth i n t h e R&R, P l a i n t i f f ' s r e q u e s t f o r i n f o r m a p a u p e r i s s t a t u s i s DENIED a n d t h e s e a c t i o n s a r e DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. SO ORDERED, t h i s 3 day o f A p r i l , 2 018. ORINDA D. EVANS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.