Lee v. Unknown Defendant, No. 1:2016cv04249 - Document 8 (N.D. Ga. 2017)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING 6 Final Report and Recommendation. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Signed by Judge Orinda D. Evans on 4/17/17. (jkl)

Download PDF
Lee v. Unknown Defendant Doc. 8 ' mmmamMmB I N THE UNITED STATES D I S T R I C T COUR'F'®'^'^^ FOR THE NORTHERN D I S T R I C T OF GEORGIA ATLANTA D I V I S I O N ^ p p \ % 2017 BRANDON CHE LEE, : 3^^. * Petitioner, C I V I L ACTION F I L E NO. 1:16-CV-424 9-ODE-JFK V. UNKNOWN DEFENDANT, Respondent. ORDER T h i s p r o se c i v i l and Recommendation filed March 14, a c t i o n i s b e f o r e t h e Court on t h e F i n a l o f U n i t e d S t a t e s M a g i s t r a t e Judge 2017 [Doc. 6] ("R&R"). F. King o b j e c t i o n s have No Janet Report been filed. In forma t h e R&R, pauperis prejudice. Judge King status has filed d i s m i s s e d as f r i v o l o u s , and that Petitioner that that this action Judge King found and Specifically, incarcerated, recommends at least Petitioner be dismissed that three c i v i l no imminent actions that threat without Petitioner, malicious, or f o r failure shows be d e n i e d i n have while been to state a claim, serious physical of injury. The Court having read and considered absence o f any o b j e c t i o n s t h e r e t o , order of the Petitioner's action Court. For the t h e R&R and noting the i t i s ADOPTED a s t h e o p i n i o n a n d reasons set forth request f o r i n forma p a u p e r i s s t a t u s i n the i s DENIED a n d R&R, this i s D I S M I S S E D WITHOUT PREJUDICE. SO ORDERED, t h i s ^1 day o f A p r i l , 2017. L ORINDA D. EVANS UNITED STATES D I S T R I C T JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.