Harpo v. Fulton County Superior Court, No. 1:2016cv01065 - Document 8 (N.D. Ga. 2016)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER denying as moot 5 , 6 , 7 all pending motions. Signed by Judge William S. Duffey, Jr on 4/13/2016. (anc)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Harpo v. Fulton County Superior Court Doc. 8 Dockets.Justia.com OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Wilhy Harpo’s (“Plaintiff”) following motions filed in Civil Action No 1:16-cv-1065: “Motion to Supplement Incomplete Filings” [5], Plaintiff’s Emergency Petition for Automatic Stay & Petition for Temporary Restraining Order & Petition for Permanent Injunction & Petition for Declaratory Judgment & Petition for Mandamus,” [6] and “Plaintiff’s Motion to Reinstate Case & Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order & Set Emergency Hearing for Preliminary Injunction” [7]. Also before the Court are Plaintiff’s following motions filed in Civil Action No. 1:16-cv-1066: “Motion to Supplement Incomplete Filings” [5], “Plaintiff’s Motion to Reinstate Case & Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order & Set Emergency Hearing for Preliminary Injunction” [7]. Also before the Court are Plaintiff’s following motion’s filed in Civil Action No. 1:16-cv-1067: “Motion to Supplement Incomplete Filings” [4], “Motion to Replace Incomplete Filings” [5], “Emergency (Original Consolidated) Petition for Emergency Temporary Injunction & Petition for Permanent Injunction” [6], and “Plaintiff’s Motion to Reinstate Case & Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order & Set Emergency Hearing for Preliminary Injunction” [7] (together with the motions filed in Civil Action 2 Nos. 1:16-cv-1065 and 1:16-cv-1066, the “Post-Dismissal Motions”). On March 31, 2016, Plaintiff filed applications for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and motions seeking various injunctive relief in each of the above-captioned actions (the “Actions”). On April 1, 2016, the Court entered orders in the Actions. ([2]). In the orders, the Court noted that, because Plaintiff is a frequent filer of frivolous lawsuits, the Court has previously ordered Plaintiff “to disclose his full litigation history in any civil rights complaint and/or [IFP] affidavit that he files.” See Harpo v. City of Atlanta, No. 1:14-cv-2157-WSD (N.D. Ga. 2014) (ECF No. 2 at 1-2); Harpo v. Fulton Cty. Sheriff, No. 1:14-cv2208-WSD (N.D. Ga. 2014) (ECF No. 2 at 1-2). Plaintiff failed to disclose his full litigation history in his applications to appeal IFP or in the other documents filed in the Actions, and the Court dismissed the Actions pursuant to Local Rule 41.3(A)(2), NDGa, for failure to comply with a lawful order of the Court. On April 5 and 6, 2016, Plaintiff filed his Post-Dismissal Motions. The Post-Dismissal Motions do not disclose Plaintiff’s full litigation history. Further, the Post-Dismissal Motions seek relief in actions that the Court has dismissed. The Court thus denies all of Plaintiff’s Post-Dismissal Motions as moot. For the foregoing reasons, 3 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all pending motions in Civil Action Nos. 1:16-cv-1065, 1:16-cv-1066, and 1:16-cv-1067 are DENIED AS MOOT. SO ORDERED this 13th day of April, 2016. _______________________________ WILLIAM S. DUFFEY, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 4
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
