Luster v. Sterling Jewelers, Inc., No. 1:2015cv02854 - Document 12 (N.D. Ga. 2015)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER that the parties are required to submit, on or before December 10, 2015, an Amended Joint Detailed Discovery Plan. The parties are required to submit a further Amended Joint Detailed Discovery Plan on or before March 15, 2016. See order for specifics. Signed by Judge William S. Duffey, Jr on 11/2/2015. (anc)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Luster v. Sterling Jewelers, Inc. Doc. 12 Dockets.Justia.com which each expert will be deposed (if the plan is required early in the case, the parties will be required to provide a beginning and end for the period during which expert depositions will be conducted). On October 28, 2015, the parties submitted their Plan. The Plan consists mostly of argumentation, unnecessary explanation, and other extraneous information. More importantly, the parties have failed to provide the required deposition dates for deponents they have identified.1 For the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties are required to submit, on or before December 10, 2015, an Amended Joint Detailed Discovery Plan listing the information mandated by paragraph 14 of the Court’s Standing Order Regarding Civil Litigation, and omitting any argumentation, unnecessary explanation or other extraneous information. The Amended Joint Detailed Discovery Plan is required to contain the dates of all depositions for deponents the parties have identified. The parties are required to submit a further Amended Joint Detailed Discovery Plan on or before March 15, 2016. In this Amended Plan, the parties shall identify 1 The Court understands discovery is ongoing, and dates set months in advance may be subject to change. 2 all deponents, except experts, that will be deposed, and state the dates on which all remaining depositions will be conducted. SO ORDERED this 2nd day of November, 2015. _______________________________ WILLIAM S. DUFFEY, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 3
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
