Quach v. Paragon Systems Inc., No. 1:2015cv00750 - Document 27 (N.D. Ga. 2016)

Court Description: ORDER: The Report and Recommendation, and the 26 objections thereto, the 25 Report and Recommendation is approved and adopted as the opinion and order of this Court. As such, Plaintiffs 18 Amended Motion to Amend is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiff is ORDERED to file an Amended Complaint within fourteen days that asserts only his race discrimination claims in violation of Title VII and § 1981. Defendant is ORDERED to file a responsive pleading in accordance with the deadlin es set forth in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In light of the Courts ruling regarding an Amended Complaint, Defendants 3 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as moot. The Clerk is DIRECTED to terminate the pending status of the Report and Recommendation regarding the 15 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 03/28/16. (sk)

Download PDF
Quach v. Paragon Systems Inc. Doc. 27 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION SAM QUACH, Plaintiff, v. PARAGON SYSTEMS INC., Defendant. : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15-CV-750-RWS ORDER This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Russell G. Vineyard [Doc. No. 24]. Having carefully considered the record, the Report and Recommendation, and the objections thereto [Doc. No. 26], the Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 24] is approved and adopted as the opinion and order of this Court. As such, Plaintiff’s Amended Motion to Amend [Doc. No. 18] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiff is ORDERED to file an Amended Complaint within fourteen days that asserts only his race discrimination claims in violation of Title VII and § 1981. Defendant is ORDERED to file a responsive pleading in accordance with the deadlines set forth in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In light of the Court’s ruling regarding an Amended Complaint, Defendant’s AO 72A (Rev.8/8 2) Dockets.Justia.com Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 3] is DENIED as moot. The Clerk is DIRECTED to terminate the pending status of the Report and Recommendation regarding the Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 15]. SO ORDERED, this 28th day of March, 2016. ________________________________ RICHARD W. STORY United States District Judge 2 AO 72A (Rev.8/8 2)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.