Godwin v. Wellstar Health Systems, Inc., No. 1:2012cv03752 - Document 95 (N.D. Ga. 2016)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER on the parties' deposition designations and objections to deposition designations as to the deposition testimony of Kenneth Raymond Tifft. See Order for additional information. Signed by Judge William S. Duffey, Jr on 2/23/2016. (anc)

Download PDF

Godwin v. Wellstar Health Systems, Inc. Doc. 95 Dockets.Justia.com 69:8-22 71:9-74:3 74:8-75:8 83:6-85:6 86:14-88:16 20:9-25 Evidence excluded by Order on Motion in Limine Evidence excluded by Order on Motion in Limine Evidence excluded by Order on Motion in Limine Evidence excluded by Order on Motion in Limine Evidence excluded by Order on Motion in Limine Fed. R. Evid. 403 21:1-4 Fed. R. Evid. 403, 801, 802 26:12-25 Fed. R. Evid. 401, 403, 403, 602, calls for speculation 27:1-24 Fed. R. Evid. 401, 403, 403, 602, calls for speculation Fed. R. Evid. 401, 403, 403 44:22-25 45:1-2, 15-23 Fed. R. Evid. 401, 403, 403 47:10-14 Fed. R. Evid. 801, 802 2 Objection sustained for reasons stated in the Order. Objection sustained for reasons stated in the Order. Objection sustained for reasons stated in the Order. Objection sustained for reasons stated in the Order. Objection sustained for reasons stated in the Order. Objection overruled. Testimony is relevant to claims and defenses asserted. Objections overruled. Testimony is relevant to claims and defenses asserted. Objections overruled. Testimony is relevant to claims and defenses asserted. Objections overruled. Testimony is relevant to claims and defense asserted. Objections sustained. Testimony is not relevant and would be confusing and misleading to the jury. Objections sustained. Testimony is not relevant and would be confusing and misleading to the jury. Objections sustained. Testimony is not relevant. 47:15-22 47:23-25 48:1-2 57:3-24 62:1-10 64:12-21 89:18-22 90:2-11, 20-25 91:1-6 Objections overruled. Testimony is relevant to Plaintiff’s job performance requirements and Plaintiff’s credibility. Objections sustained. Fed. R. Evid. 801, 802 Testimony is ambiguous and not relevant. Fed. R. Evid. 401, 403, 403 Objections sustained. Testimony is ambiguous and not relevant. Fed. R. Evid. 401, 403, 403 Objections overruled. Testimony is relevant to claims and defense asserted. Fed. R. Evid. 401, 403, 403 Objections overruled. Testimony is relevant to claims and defenses asserted. Fed. R. Evid. 401, 403, Objections overruled. 403, Testimony is relevant to 602, calls for speculation claims and defenses asserted. Fed. R. Evid. 602, calls for Objections overruled. speculation Testimony is relevant to claims and defenses asserted. Fed. R. Evid. 602, calls for Objections overruled. speculation Testimony is relevant to claims and defenses asserted. Fed. R. Evid. 602, calls for Objections overruled. speculation Testimony is relevant to claims and defenses asserted. Fed. R. Evid. 801, 802 3 96:24-25 97:1-11 98:15-21 101:16-23 104:23-25 105:1-5 105:13-25 106:1-9 115:13-20 Fed. R. Evid. 401, 403, 403 Objections overruled if Defendant introduces lines that appear before the testimony designated on this page. Fed. R. Evid. 401, 403, 403 Objections overruled if Defendant introduces testimony that appears before the testimony designated on this page. Fed. R. Evid. 401, 403, 403 Objections overruled if Defendant introduces testimony on page 96. Fed. R. Evid. 401, 403, 403 Objections overruled. Testimony is relevant to claims and defenses asserted. Fed. R. Evid. 801, 802 Objections sustained. Testimony is ambiguous and speculative. Fed. R. Evid. 801, 802 Objections sustained. Testimony is ambiguous and speculative. Fed. R. Evid. 401, 403, Objections overruled. 403, 602, calls for Testimony is relevant to speculation claims and defenses asserted. Fed. R. Evid. 401, 403, Objections overruled. 403, 602, calls for Testimony is relevant to speculation claims and defenses asserted. Fed. R. Evid. 602, calls for Objections sustained. speculation Testimony is ambiguous and speculative. 4 142:12-22 157:19-25 Fed. R. Evid. 401, 403, 403 Objections overruled. Testimony is relevant to claims and defenses asserted. Fed. R. Evid. 401, 403, Objections overruled. 403, calls for speculation Testimony is relevant to claims, defenses, and circumstances of resignation. SO ORDERED this 23rd day of February, 2016. _______________________________ WILLIAM S. DUFFEY, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 5

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.