Sanchez Jaquez v. Bureau of Prisons et al, No. 1:2011cv02622 - Document 7 (N.D. Ga. 2012)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 5 Final Report and Recommendation as the order and opinion of the Court, DISMISSING this action WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Clarence Cooper on 1/13/2012. (mdy)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Sanchez Jaquez v. Bureau of Prisons et al Doc. 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION MANUEL RAMON SANCHEZ JAQUEZ, Plaintiff, : : : : : : : : v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al., Defendants. FEDERAL PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV-2622-CC ORDER Magistrate Judge Baverman issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that this case be dismissed without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with a lawful order of the Court and to advise the Court of his current address. (Doc. 5.) Plaintiff has not filed objections to the R&R. A district judge must conduct a careful and complete review of a magistrate judge’s R&R. Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732, 732 (11th Cir. 1982). The district judge must “make a de novo determination of those portions of the [R&R] to which objection is made,” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), while those portions of the R&R for which there is no objection are reviewed only for clear error, Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App’x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006). AO 72A (Rev.8/82) Dockets.Justia.com The Court has reviewed the R&R and finds no clear error. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the R&R [5] as the opinion of the Court. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. January SO ORDERED this 13THday of , 2012. s/ CLARENCE COOPER _____________________________________ CLARENCE COOPER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2 AO 72A (Rev.8/82)
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
