Terrell v. Atlanta Judicial Circuit et al, No. 1:2010cv01843 - Document 2 (N.D. Ga. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER AND OPINION denying leave to proceed IFP, dismissing case without prejudice. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr on 7/9/10. (dr)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Terrell v. Atlanta Judicial Circuit et al Doc. 2 'h.!JI..~ '1'-'1",~,'" C~ ¢ .Q D *. .,..~ "-'113~ " .C J {j, i9",~ I'i. . "'tl'1l)t:: v. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURl",41. ~ f) <Q/i FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEOItCI5~."'~~"l 'D ATLANTA DIVISION ~~~c~6,* . DeIJ WILLIE JAMES TERRELL, JR., : U/yC1er.+ Inmate No. 893844, PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS Plaintiff, 42 U.S.c. § 1983 . .. v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:10-CV-1843-TWT ATLANTA JUDICIAL CIRCUIT; et aI., Defendants. ORDER AND OPINION Plaintiff seeks leave to tile the instant civil rights action without paying the $350.00 filing fee. According to Subsection (g) of28 U.S.c. § 19l5, a prisoner is prohibited from bringing a civil action in federal court in forma pauperis "ifthe I prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury." This Court's records indicate that Plaintiff has filed numerous complaints and appeals, the following of which were dismissed prior to service ofprocess as frivolous: Terrell v. Grady Mem'l Hosp., Civil Action No.1 :08-CV-3931-TWT A072A (Rev.8/82) Dockets.Justia.com (ND. Ga.); Terrell v. Fulton County, Civil Action No.1 :09-CV-513-TWT (N.D. Ga.); and Terrell v. Grady Mem'l Hosp., Appeal No. 09-130770D (llth Cir.). Aside from his allegations ofpolice misconduct, Plaintiffcomplains about general "injuries" that have gone without proper treatment and assaults against him while he was at the Fulton County Jail. Past injuries do not create an imminent danger of serious physical injury. See Medberry v. Butler, 185 F.3d 1189, 1193 (llth Cir. 1999) ("[A] prisoner's allegation that he faced imminent danger sometime in the past is an insufficient basis to allow him to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to the imminent danger exception to the statute. "); AbdulAkbar v. McKelvie, 239 F.3d 307, 315 (3d Cir. 200 I) (stating that past danger is not imminent). Moreover, Plaintiff is no longer at the Fulton County Jail. Thus, there is no indication that Plaintiff is "under imminent danger of serious physical injury." Accordingly, leave for Plaintiff to proceed in fOffim pauperis is hereby DENIED. According to the Eleventh Circuit, "the proper procedure is for the district court to dismiss the complaint without prejudice when it denies the prisoner leave to proceed in fanna pauperis pursuant to the three strikes provision of § 1915(g). A072A (Rev.8/82) The prisoner ... must pay the filing fee at the time he initiates the suit." Dupree v. Palmer, 284 F.3d 1234, 1236 (11th Cir. 2002). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the instant action IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS SO ORDERED this !L day of ~, 20 I O. THOMAS W. THRASH, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRlCT JUDGE 3 A072A (Rev. 8/82) hereby
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
