Pitts v. Flint Judicial Court et al, No. 1:2010cv00389 - Document 6 (N.D. Ga. 2010)

Court Description: ORDER AND OPINION dismissing case without prejudice pursuant to Local Rule 41.2. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr on 5/3/10. (dr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS 42 U.S .C . ยง 1983 DARKEN DEWAYNE PITTS, Plaintiff, V. FLINT JUDICIAL COURT, et al ., Defendants . CIVIL ACTION NO . 1 :10-CV-03 89-TWT-WEJ ORDER and OPINION This matter is before the Court because mail addressed to Plaintiff at his address of record has been returned as undeliverable . Plaintiff has not notified the Court of his release or whereabouts . Under Local Rule 41 .2, "[t]he. failure . . . of a party appearing pro se to keep the clerk's office informed of any change in address and/or telephone number which causes a delay or otherwise adversely affects the management of the case shall constitute grounds . . .for dismissal of the action without prejudice . . . ." As this Court has no information regarding Plaintiff's whereabouts, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff's complaint be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Local Rule 41 .2. IT IS SO ORD ERED, this 3 day of 2010 . THOMAS W . THRASH, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.