Brown v. United States of America, No. 1:2016cv22323 - Document 6 (S.D. Fla. 2016)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO VACATE, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ; adopting Report and Recommendations re 5 Report and Recommendations. Certificate of Appealability: DENIED Closing Case. Motions terminated: 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS on 28 USC 2255 case re 1 Motion (Complaint) to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255) filed by Jamal Brown Recommending that the motion to vacate be summarily DENIED, and that no certificate of appealability be issued.. Signe d by Judge Patricia A. Seitz on 9/2/2016. (yha) NOTICE: If there are sealed documents in this case, they may be unsealed after 1 year or as directed by Court Order, unless they have been designated to be permanently sealed. See Local Rule 5.4 and Administrative Order 2014-69. Modified text on 9/2/2016 (yha).
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Brown v. United States of America Doc. 6 UNI TED STATES DISTRI CO URT CT SOUTHERN DI STRI OF FLO RI CT DA CA SE N O.1 22323- V- TZ 6CI SE1 ( s No. 2 20 38 CI SE1 Ca e 0 - 9 - V- TZ) J AL BROW N, AM M ovant , UN I TED STATES OF AM ERI CA, Res pondent . / O RDER D ENY I G M O TI TO VA CA TE N ON THI M ATTER i beor t eCo r o t Re o t n Re o nd to ( 5 , S s f e h u t n he p r a d c mme ai n DE ) rc mme digt a M o a tsM o int Va aeSe tnc L 1 bed n e M o a t e o n n h t v n ' to o c t n e e DE ) e id. v n c le hal ngest c tt i iy ofhi e nc s nt he onsiutonalt s nha ed e ence a an Ar ed Ca e rCrm i li lght s m r e i na n i o Jo n o v Unie St e ,1 S. . 51( 1 ) Ho ve,a M a ita eJ d W hi f h s n . td ats 35 Ct 25 20 5 . we r s g sr t u ge t e f u d i hi Re o tM o a wa no s b e tdt a el nc dpe ly a a Ar dCa e r o n n s p r, v nt s t u j ce o n r e nat s n me r e ha Crmi l e t eAr dCa e rCrmi lAc o 1 4(i i na und r h me r e i na t f 98 i ACCA' . t r M o a wa ' Rahe , v nt s ) de i t aCa e rOf e runde t Fede alSent nci Gui lnesbas d on num er s gna ed r e f nde r he r e ng dei e ous p irc nv di nsf rac nto ld s sa c o f n e ( 5a 2, ) M ov n ha ma eno ro o i o o o r le ub t n e fe s . DE t 7. at s d o j cin t t eRe r o issndng . be to o h po t r t i s Havi r twed t Re ta t M oton, he Cour agr st tt M oton s d be ng evi he por nd he i t t ee ha he i houl de e Assa ed i t Re t รง hi i Johns c l i o quesi pr di tng a ni d. t t n he por, i Not ng n on als nt ton e ca i n A C CA e nc e upon a pr orconvi t on f a l e i dr of e e.' f a 1 1 nha em nt i c i or s r ous ug f ns '' #. t 3- 4 ( iainso te ) Si lry nohig i J hn o c lsi o q e to pr d c tngaCa e r ctto mitd . mia l, t n n o s n al nt u si n e iai re Ofe renhance ntupon aconviton f aic r ld s t ofens 'Se U. S. j fnde me ci or lontole ubsance f e.' e S. G. 4812.TheCo r t r f r fn st a r a o a l j rsswo dno fndt eCo r' te t nt . u thee o e i d h t e s n b e u it ul t i h u ts r ame Dockets.Justia.com ofM ova ' c ai de t bl Thus no ce tfc eofa nts l m ba a e. , rii at ppea a lt i wa r nt Acc di y, l biiy s r a ed. or ngl ORDERED THAT Th Re o t n Re o n to g 5 i AFFI ED AND ADOPTED. e p r a d c mme dain DE 1 s RM M o a tsM o i nt Va ae( 1 i DENI v n ' to o c t DE 1 s ED. A Ce tfca eofAppealbiiy i DENI rii t a lt s ED. 4) Thec ei CLOSED. as s DONEa dORDE i MimiFoiati X n RED n a , lrd,hs a o Spe e, 0 6 y f e tmbr2 1 . % . y PA TRI A A.SEI CI TZ UN I TED STATES DI STRI J CT UDGE c c: A1 couns ofr d l el ecor Hon.W ila C. nof li m Tur f
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
