Rice v. United States of America, No. 1:2011cv22172 - Document 51 (S.D. Fla. 2014)

Court Description: ORDER AND OPINION denying 47 Motion for Certificate of Appealability; denying 49 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Patricia A. Seitz on 10/22/2014. (yha) Modified to convert to opinion on 10/22/2014 (yha).

Download PDF

Rice v. United States of America Doc. 51 U NI TED STATES D ISTRICT C OURT SOUTHERN D ISTRICT OF FLO RI DA Cas N o.11e 22172- V- TZ CI SEI J ESROBERT RI AM CE, Pet toner, ii UN I TED STA TES O F AM ERI CA, Re pondent s . / O RDER D ENYI CERTI CATE OFA PPEALABI TY NG FI LI AND D ENYI LEAVE TO A PPEAL I FORM A PAUPERI NG N S On J y30,201 t Cour dim i ed PettonerJ ul 2, he t s ss ii amesRober Rie' s ton 2255 t c s eci m o i n a s c s i ( 2 . Hes e ue l move unde Rul 6 f rr le fo to s uc e sve.DE- 3) ubs q nty d r e 0 o eif r m t tdimis la lgi ' r ud on t Cour . ( 3 ) Aug t2 , 0 4 t Cour ha s s a, le ng ' a f he t' DE- 4.On ' us 9 2 1 , he t de ed hi Rul 60 m oton on t m ert bec e hehad f l t alege a m at i ni s e i he is aus aied o l ny eral mir pr snttons ( 4 )Rienow mo sf la t a a i omap up rsa se ee ai .DE-2. c ve or e ve o ppe l nf r a ei, s wela f ac riia eofa a a lt i r quie ( 4 , 9. l s or e tfc t ppe lbiiy,f e r d.DE- 7 4 1 A sa i talm ater Rie doesneed a c tfc e ofa n nii t , c er ii at ppeal biiy.Ge aly,'a1 a lt ner l ' 1 fnaldecs ons oft dit i tcour soft U nied St es'ar appea abl under28 U . C. i ii he s rc t he t at ' e l e S. j1 9 , t r i a a tona r quie e i ha a c s s ape ii rm a o y 2 1 but he e s n ddii l e r m nt n be s a e : ttone y nl appeala ' i or i a pr ' nal der n f oceedi unders ton 2255'by obt ni a c tfc e of ng ec i ' ai ng er ii at appeal biiy,w hih r a lt c equi e 'a s t i s r s ' ubs antal how i oft deni ofa cons iutona ng he al tt i l rght'2 U. C. 2 5 . c a gue t tt sa to l e uie ntdo snota y i . 8 S. j 2 3 Rie r s ha hi ddiina r q r me ' e ppl her bec e hi m oton c l e aus s i halenged t i egrt oft ha he nt iy he beaspr eedi ,nott oc ngs he m ert ofhi underyi c i i lc is s l ng rm na onvi i Buti t El cton. n he event Ci c t 'a c tfc e of h r ui, ' er ii at a aa lt i r quie f rt a a o a de a ofaRul 6 b)m o i n f r le ppe lbiiy s e r d o he ppe l f ny nil e 0( to or eif fo aj r m udgme i aj2 5 orj 2 55pr e di 'J c s n ' Cr s y 43 F. 1 9 ,1 9 nt n 24 2 oc e ng. a k o f o b , 7 3d 2 0 2 4 ' ? . Dockets.Justia.com (1hCi. 0 6 (iai o te . c ' ctto t S 1 t r 2 0 ) ctton mitd)Ries iain o ummes?. e ',Flrd De .f r JS cy oia pto Co r, 6 F d. r.5 9 e Appx. 46 8 ( 1h Ci. 01 (hede a ofam o i n t r o n i ' t 8 , 48 1 t r 2 4) t ni l to o e pe s ' no s j c t t COA r q r me . . c us i doe notdipos o t me iso aha a ub e t o he e uie nt . be a e t s s e f he rt f be s pr e di ' i t r f r una ii oc e ng/ s he e o e valng. ) To o an ac riia eofa aa lt r ga d ng a or rde ng aRul 6 @ ) bt i e tfc t ppe lbiiy e r i n de nyi e0 m oton 'on pr edur gr i ' oc al oundsw ihoutr hi t m ert ofany c tt i l t eac ng he is ons iutona c ai s'Ri m us m ake 'bo h a s t i ls l m z' ce t ' t ubs anta how i t he had ava i c ai oft ng hat ld l m he deni ofa cons i tonalrght and a s t i s al tm i i , ubs antal how i t t pr edur r i i ng hat he oc al ulng s wr ng. J c s n 43 F. a 1 9 ( mpha i i org na )(ia i n om it d) Rhi i o ' a ko , 7 3d t 2 5 e ' ss n i i l ct to te . ' s s bec e t ei ltl poi i alow i t appealofa pr edur r i unl st aus her s ite nt n l ng he oc al ulng es hat r i er oneous y pr vent a pettonerf om pur ui a vald c ai .Se Sl k7. ulng r l e ed ii r s ng i l m e ac J M c nil5 9U. 4 3 4 4( 0 0 . Da e, 2 S. 7 , 8 2 0 ) Ri e c m akeneihe s c an t r how i Regar es ofa er or i pr ng. dl s ny r s n onouncng hi i s s nt e,and r e enc egar es ofa m i har t i i by t gove nm e ofhow hi dl s ny sc ac erzatons he r nt s s enc waspr ent e onounced,CountIoft Amended J he udgm e c r ty r l t t nt or ecl efecs he c i f whih hewa c r d, re a c ce ( 1 - )Sot r i no s wi rme or c s ha ge tid, nd onvit d.DE- 2 3. he e s ho ng oft de alofa c tt i lrght And hi Rul 60 m oton di notst e a c ai f he ni ons iutona i . s e i d at l m or f aud on t Cour bec e i di notalege 'egr ousm iconduc ,s h asbrbe y ofa r he t aus t d l ' egi s t uc i r j eorme r ofaj y ort fbrc to of vi nc by apa t i whih a udg mbe s ur , he a ia in e de e ry n c n a t ne i i ia e 'Gaaoo,. tdStts 3 4Fe Appx. 7 ,6 2( 1h Ci. 01 ) tor y s mplc td. ltl f Unie a e, 9 d. ' ? 6 0 7 1 t r2 0. So t e i no s her s how i t t pr edur lr i denyi hi m oton w asw r ng hat he oc a ulng ng s i ong. Ther or ,Rie i notentted t a c tfca e ofappeal biiy. ef e c s il o erii t a lt Fo t s mer a o Riei note ild t pr e di omap u ei. dea Rul r he a e s n, c s ntte o oc e nf r a p rs Fe rl e of Appel t Pr c dur 2 a ()r q r st ta moton f l a t a a i f m a la e o e e 4( )1 e uie ha ny i or e ve o ppe l n or pa rsi l a a fda tt t( )s t outt pa t si biiy t pa ( )cam sa upe i ncude n fi vi ha 1 e s he ry' na lt o y, 2 l i n e ilm e t r dr s , nd ( )sae t is st tt pa t i e t pr s nto ntte nt o e e s a 3 t ts he s ue ha he ry nt nds o e e n appeal By f lng t es a ih a vald cai oft deni ofa c tt i lrght Ri e . aii o t bls i lm he al ons iutona i , c f l t c ai an e il entt r es . ais o l m nttem o edr s A c or ngl i i c di y, t s O RDERED t hat 1 Riesm o i n f ac riia eo a aa lt ( 4 1i DENI ) c ' to or e tfc t f ppe l biiy DE- 7 s ED. 2 Riesmoto frla t a a i omap u ei ( 49 i DENI . ) c ' in o e ve o ppe lnf r a p rs DE- Js ED. DONEAND ORDERED i M imiFlrda t s n a , o i ,hilv da o Ocobe 2 4. y f t r 01 ' .- . Q y .> - PATRI A A .SEI CI UNI TED STATES DI CTJ STRI UDGE C: C Couns lofRe d e cor

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.