Chow et al v. Chau et al, No. 1:2009cv21893 - Document 451 (S.D. Fla. 2014)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT ON COSTS FOR CERTAIN PLAINTIFFS AND PLAINTIFF/COUNTER DEFENDANTS: in favor of TC Ventures, Inc., Michael Chow against Dave 60 NYC, Inc., Stratis Morfogen; in favor of MC Miami Enterprises, LLC, MC Tribeca, LLC, Mr Chow Enterprises, LTD , TC Ventures, Inc., Michael Chow against Dave 60 NYC, Inc., Philippe Miami LLC, Philippe Restaurant Corp., Philippe West Coast LLC, Philippe Chow. Signed by Senior Judge William M. Hoeveler on 09/29/2014. (yar) Modified on 9/30/2014 to opinion per chambers (ch1).

Download PDF
Chow et al v. Chau et al Doc. 451 UNI TED STATES DI STRICT COU RT SO UTH ERN DISTRI 0F FLORI CT DA CASE N O .09. 21893. V . O EVELER Cl H M I AEL CH OW know n as CH ï R.CH OW ' etal, C M ' . Pl ntfs, ai if CHAK YAM CHAU ,etal, . Def endant . s / FI NAL JUD GM ENT 0N CO STS FO R CERTM N PLM N TI FFS Ar PLM N TI COU N TER . EFEX A NTS FF/ D Purs uant t t s Cour ' Am ended Or on Fees and Cos s ent ed on o hi ts der t er t doc on Se em ber 29,2014,i i he ket pt ts ORDERED AN D ADJU D GED t Fi Judgm entbe and i i her hat nal t s eby ent ed i f er n avor ofPl ntfs T. W N TURES,I C.and M I AEL CH OW , ai if C. N CH ji l ag ns Dee ant DAVZ 6 NYC, NC.a STRATI M ORFOGEN, onty, ai t fnd s 0 I nd S j i l and s ve a l f c t i t t t lam o ofEI o nty e r ly, or os s n he o a unt GHT THOUSAND DOLIARS ( 000) f whih sum 1 exec i isue.I addii i i U $8, , or c et uton s n ton, t s ORDERED A N D ADJU DG ED t hat Fi Judgm ent be and i i her nal ts eby ent ed i f er n avor of Pl nt fs count Def ai if / er- endant M I AEL CH OW , M R. s CH CH OW EN TERPRISES, LTD . M C M l l ENTERPRI , AM SES, LLC, M C TRI BECA, LLC, and T. VENTU RES, INC. j nty, agai t Count C. , oi l ns er Dockets.Justia.com A LI Pl nt fs PH I PPE CHAU CH OW , PH I PPE M I M I LLC, PH I PPE ai if LI I LI RESTAUM NT CORP. PHI PPE W EST COAST LLC,and DAVZ 60 NYC, , LI I , j nty and s ve aly, f r c s s i t t t amount o EI NC. oi l e r l o o t n he o al f GHT THOUSAND,ONE HUNDRED AND FI FW DOLLARS ( 1 0) f r whih $8, 5 , o c sum 1 e et xecuton i sue. i s I er on t s Fi Judgm ent f cos s s lac rue f om t dat of nt est hi nal or t hal c r he e t e r o t Co ts Ame d Or e o Fe s and Co t ( pt he nty f he ur ' nde dr n e s s Se embe 2 r 9, 201 ) att s at o y r e ass tf r h i 28 U. C.j 1 . 4 , he t ut r at e ot n S. 961 DON E AN D ORDERED i Cham bers at M i i M i iDade Count n am , am y, Fl i t s 29t day ofSept ber 2014. or da, hi h em , . y / . W I AM M .H OEW LER LLI SEN I U . DI OR S. STRI JUD GE CT Copi f ni hed t es ur s o: Ros ar W ider,Es em y l q. Ant hony Ac et a,Esq. c t Cur i B.M i ,Esq. ts ner Ber r Fi ds Es t am el , q. Vi ncentJ.Ancona,Esq. 'The Cour i advi t Def ts sed hat endantChak Yam Chau i now known asPhii Chau s lppe Chow.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.