SPY OPTIC INC. v. The Individuals, Business Entities, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", No. 0:2021cv62472 - Document 37 (S.D. Fla. 2022)

Court Description: ORDER granting 35 Motion for Default Judgment. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 3/22/2022. See attached document for full details. (rm02)

Download PDF
SPY OPTIC INC. v. The Individuals, Business Entities, and Unincorpora...ed on Schedule "A" Doc. 37 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 21-CV-62472-RAR SPY OPTIC INC., Plaintiff, v. THE INDIVIDUALS, BUSINESS ENTITIES, AND UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE “A,” Defendants. / ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR FINAL DEFAULT JUDGMENT THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Final Default Judgment [ECF No. 35] (“Motion”). Plaintiff Spy Optic, Inc. seeks entry of a default final judgment against Defendants, the Individuals, Business Entities, and Unincorporated Associations identified on Schedule “A” that operate commercial Internet websites and/or ecommerce stores that infringe Plaintiff’s trademarks and promote and sell counterfeit goods bearing and/or using Plaintiff’s trademarks. See generally Mot. [ECF No. 35]. Plaintiff requests the Court: (1) enjoin Defendants from producing or selling goods that infringe on its trademarks; (2) disable, or at Plaintiff’s election, transfer the domain names at issue to Plaintiff; (3) assign all rights, title, and interest, to the domain names to Plaintiff and permanently delist or deindex the domain names from any Internet search engines; (4) remove the listings and associated images of goods bearing and/or using counterfeits and infringements of Plaintiff’s trademarks at issue, and the goods of each Defendant bearing one or more of Plaintiff’s trademarks held by the Internet marketplaces be surrendered to Plaintiff; and (5) award statutory damages. See generally id. Dockets.Justia.com A Clerk’s Default [ECF No. 31] was entered against Defendants on March 10, 2022, after Defendants failed to respond to the Amended Complaint [ECF No. 19], despite having been served. See Proof of Service [ECF No. 29]. The Court having considered the record and noting no opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff’s Motion [ECF No. 35] is GRANTED for the reasons stated herein. Pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a default final judgment will be entered by separate order. BACKGROUND 1 A. Factual Background Plaintiff is the owner of the following trademarks, which are valid and registered on the Principal Register of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“Spy Optic Marks”): Trademark Registration Number Registration Date SPY 1,981,513 June 18, 1996 SCOOP 2,146,655 March 24, 1998 IC 009. Sunglasses. 2,157,268 March 12, 1998 IC 009. Sunglasses. 3,489,694 August 19, 2008 IC 009. Sunglasses. LOGAN SPY 3,750,166 February 16, 2010 1 Class / Goods IC 009. Glasses and sunglasses. IC 035. Retail store services and online retail store services featuring sunglasses, sports goggles, and wearing apparel. The factual background is taken from Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint, Motion, and supporting Declarations submitted by Plaintiff. Page 2 of 24 TRON 3,981,518 June 21, 2011 IC 009. Sunglasses. HAPPY LENS 4,463,426 January 7, 2014 MCCOY 4,538,368 May 27, 2014 IC 009. Sunglasses. SPY GLASSES 4,805,274 September 1, 2015 IC 009. Sunglasses. SPY LOGAN 4,805,275 September 1, 2015 IC 009. Sunglasses. SPY DOOM 4,805,277 September 1, 2015 IC 009. Sunglasses. SPY HELM 4,805,292 September 1, 2015 IC 009. Sunglasses. SPY TOURING 4,805,293 September 1, 2015 IC 009. Sunglasses. SPY FLYNN 4,805,294 September 1, 2015 IC 009. Sunglasses. 4,859,917 November 24, 2015 IC 009. Sunglasses; protective goggles for use in motorcycling, skiing, snowboarding, and biking. SPY DISCORD 4,914,603 March 8, 2016 IC 009. Sunglasses. DISCORD 4,919,079 March 15, 2016 IC 009. Sunglasses. IC 009: Lens used in glasses, sunglasses, and goggles. See Decl. of Damon Cook (“Cook Decl.”) [ECF No. 6-2] ¶ 5. The Spy Optic Marks are used in connection with the development, manufacture, and distribution of high-quality goods in the categories identified above. See id. ¶¶ 4–5. Page 3 of 24 Plaintiff’s representative reviewed and visually inspected the detailed web page captures and photographs reflecting various products bearing Plaintiff’s trademarks offered for sale through the commercial Internet websites and/or e-commerce stores operating under Defendants’ domain names and seller identification names identified on Schedule “A” (“Subject Domain Names and Seller IDs”) and determined the products were non-genuine, unauthorized versions of Plaintiff’s products. See id. ¶¶ 14–15. Based on its investigation, Plaintiff alleges Defendants have advertised, promoted, offered for sale, or sold goods bearing and/or using what Plaintiff has determined to be counterfeits, infringements, reproductions, or colorable imitations of the Spy Optic Marks. See id.; Am. Compl. ¶¶ 8–14, 24. Defendants are not now, nor have they ever been, authorized or licensed to use, reproduce, or make counterfeits, reproductions, or colorable imitations of the Spy Optic Marks. See Cook Decl. ¶¶ 11, 14–15. B. Procedural Background On December 8, 2021, Plaintiff filed its Complaint and on January 3, 2022, filed its Amended Complaint against Defendants. On December 9, 2021, Plaintiff filed its Ex Parte Motion for Order Authorizing Alternate Service of Process [ECF No. 7] (“Motion for Alternate Service”). The Court entered an Order Granting the Motion for Alternate Service on December 10, 2021 [ECF No. 10]. In accordance with the December 10, 2021, Order, Plaintiff served each Defendant with a Summons and a copy of the Amended Complaint via electronic mail and website posting on January 4, 2022. See Decl. of Virgilio Gigante (“Gigante Decl.”) [ECF No. 35-5] ¶ 7; Proof of Service [ECF No. 29]. Defendants failed to file an answer or other response, and the time allowed for Defendants to respond to the Amended Complaint has since expired. See Gigante Decl. ¶¶ 8–9. To Plaintiff’s knowledge, Defendants are not infants or incompetent persons, and the Page 4 of 24 Servicemembers Civil Relief Act does not apply. See id. ¶ 10. On March 10, 2022, the Clerk entered default against Defendants [ECF No. 31] for failure to plead or otherwise defend pursuant to Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff now moves the Court for default final judgment against Defendants. LEGAL STANDARD A party may apply to the court for a default judgment when the defendant fails to timely respond to a pleading. FED. R. CIV. P. 55(b)(2). “A defendant, by his default, admits the plaintiff’s well-pleaded allegations of fact, is concluded on those facts by the judgment, and is barred from contesting on appeal the facts thus established.” Eagle Hosp. Physicians, LLC v. SRG Consulting, Inc., 561 F.3d 1298, 1307 (11th Cir. 2009) (internal quotations omitted) (quoting Nishimatsu Constr. Co. v. Houston Nat’l Bank, 515 F.2d 1200, 1205 (5th Cir. 1975)). However, conclusions of law are to be determined by the court. Mierzwicki v. CAB Asset Mgmt. LLC, No. 14-61998, 2014 WL 12488533, at *1 (S.D. Fla. Dec. 30, 2014). Therefore, a court may enter a default judgment only if there is a “sufficient basis to state a claim.” Id. Once a plaintiff has established a sufficient basis for liability, the Court must conduct an inquiry to determine the appropriate damages. PetMed Express, Inc. v. MedPets.Com, Inc., 336 F. Supp. 2d 1213, 1217 (S.D. Fla. 2004). Although an evidentiary hearing is generally required, the Court need not conduct such a hearing “when . . . additional evidence would be truly unnecessary to a fully informed determination of damages.” Safari Programs, Inc. v. CollectA Int’l Ltd., 686 F. App’x 737, 746 (11th Cir. 2017). Therefore, where the record adequately supports the award of damages, an evidentiary hearing is not required. See SEC v. Smyth, 420 F.3d 1225, 1232 n.13 (11th Cir. 2005); PetMed Express, Inc., 336 F. Supp. 2d at 1217, 1223 (finding an evidentiary hearing unnecessary because plaintiff was seeking statutory damages Page 5 of 24 under the Lanham Act); Luxottica Group S.p.A. v. Casa Los Martnez Corp., No. 14-22859, 2014 WL 4948632, at *2 (S.D. Fla. Oct. 2, 2014) (same). ANALYSIS A. Claims Plaintiff seeks a default judgment for the relief sought in the Amended Complaint, asserting the following claims against Defendants: (1) trademark counterfeiting and infringement under section 32 of the Lanham Act, in violation of 15 U.S.C. section 1114 (“Claim 1”); (2) false designation of origin under section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, in violation of 15 U.S.C. section 1125(a) (“Claim 2”); (3) cybersquatting under section 43(d) of the Lanham Act, in violation of 15 U.S.C. section 1125(d) (“Claim 3”); (4) unfair competition under Florida common law (“Claim 4”); and (5) trademark infringement under Florida common law (“Claim 5”). See Am. Compl. ¶¶ 46–80. 1. Counterfeiting and Infringement Section 32 of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. section 1114, provides liability for trademark infringement if, without the consent of the registrant, a defendant uses “in commerce any reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation of a registered mark . . . which . . . is likely to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive.” 15 U.S.C. § 1114(1)(a). To prevail on its trademark infringement claim, a plaintiff must demonstrate “(1) that it had prior rights to the mark at issue and (2) that the defendant had adopted a mark or name that was the same, or confusingly similar to its mark, such that consumers were likely to confuse the two.” Planetary Motion, Inc. v. Techsplosion, Inc., 261 F.3d 1188, 1193 (11th Cir. 2001) (footnote and citations omitted). Page 6 of 24 2. False Designation of Origin The test for liability for false designation of origin under 15 U.S.C. section 1125(a) is the same as for a trademark counterfeiting and infringement claim—i.e., whether the public is likely to be deceived or confused by the similarity of the marks at issue. See Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc., 505 U.S. 763, 780 (1992) (Stevens, J., concurring in the judgment). 3. Cybersquatting The Anti-cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (“ACPA”) protects the owner of a distinctive or famous trademark from another’s bad faith intent to profit from the trademark owner’s mark by registering or using a domain name that is identical or confusingly similar to, or dilutive of, the trademark owner’s mark without regard to the goods or services of the parties. See 15 U.S.C. § 1125(d). “To prevail under the ACPA, a plaintiff must prove that (1) its mark is distinctive or famous and entitled to protection; (2) the defendant’s domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the plaintiff’s mark; and (3) the defendant registered or used the domain name with a bad faith intent to profit.” See Bavaro Palace, S.A. v. Vacation Tours, Inc., 203 F. App’x 252, 256 (11th Cir. 2006) (citing Shields v. Zuccarini, 254 F.3d 476, 482 (3d Cir. 2001)). 4. Common Law Unfair Competition Whether a defendant’s use of a plaintiff’s trademarks created a likelihood of confusion between the plaintiff’s and the defendant’s products is also the determining factor in the analysis of unfair competition under the common law of Florida. See Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc. v. Forrester, No. 83-8381, 1986 WL 15668, at *3–4 (S.D. Fla. Dec. 9, 1986) (“[I]t is clear that the Court need not find ‘actual confusion’ . . . . The proper test is ‘likelihood of confusion . . . .”’). Page 7 of 24 5. Common Law Trademark Infringement The analysis of liability for Florida common law trademark infringement is the same as the analysis of liability for trademark infringement under section 32(a) of the Lanham Act. See PetMed Express, Inc., 336 F. Supp. 2d at 1217–18. B. Liability The well-pleaded factual allegations of Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint properly contain the elements for each of the above claims and are admitted by virtue of Defendants’ defaults. See Am. Compl. ¶¶ 8–14, 24–38, 48–50, 54–58, 62–67, 72–73, and 78–79. Moreover, the Amended Complaint’s factual allegations have been substantiated by sworn declarations and other evidence and establish Defendants’ liability for each of the claims asserted. Accordingly, default judgment pursuant to Rule 55 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is appropriately entered against Defendants. C. Relief Plaintiff requests an award of equitable relief and monetary damages against Defendants for trademark infringement in Claim 1 and cybersquatting in Claim 3. The Court analyzes Plaintiff’s request for relief as to Claim 1 and Claim 3 only, as the judgment for Claims 2, 4, and 5—false designation of origin, common law unfair competition, and common law trademark infringement—is limited to entry of the requested equitable relief for Claim 1. See generally Mot. [ECF No. 35]. Injunctive Relief. Pursuant to the Lanham Act, a district court is authorized to issue an injunction “according to the principles of equity and upon such terms as the court may deem reasonable,” to prevent violations of trademark law. 15 U.S.C. § 1116(a). Indeed, “[i]njunctive relief is the remedy of choice for trademark and unfair competition cases, since there is no Page 8 of 24 adequate remedy at law for the injury caused by a defendant’s continuing infringement.” Burger King Corp. v. Agad, 911 F. Supp. 1499, 1509–10 (S.D. Fla. 1995) (alteration in original) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Century 21 Real Estate Corp. v. Sandlin, 846 F.2d 1175, 1180 (9th Cir. 1988)). Injunctive relief is available even in the default judgment setting, see, e.g., PetMed Express, Inc., 336 F. Supp. 2d at 1222–23, because Defendants’ failure to respond or otherwise appear makes it difficult for a plaintiff to prevent further infringement absent an injunction. See Jackson v. Sturkie, 255 F. Supp. 2d 1096, 1103 (N.D. Cal. 2003) (“[D]efendant’s lack of participation in this litigation has given the court no assurance that defendant’s infringing activity will cease. Therefore, plaintiff is entitled to permanent injunctive relief.”). Permanent injunctive relief is appropriate where a plaintiff demonstrates: (1) it has suffered irreparable injury; (2) there is no adequate remedy at law; (3) the balance of hardship favors an equitable remedy; and (4) an issuance of an injunction is in the public’s interest. See eBay, Inc. v. MercExchange, LLC., 547 U.S. 388, 391–92 (2006). Plaintiff has carried its burden on each of the four factors. Specifically, in trademark cases, “a sufficiently strong showing of likelihood of confusion [caused by trademark infringement] may by itself constitute a showing of . . . a substantial threat of irreparable harm.” E. Remy Martin & Co., S.A. v. Shaw-Ross Int’l Imports, Inc., 756 F.2d 1525, 1530 (11th Cir. 1985) (footnote omitted); see also Levi Strauss & Co. v. Sunrise Int’l Trading Inc., 51 F.3d 982, 986 (11th Cir. 1995) (“There is no doubt that the continued sale of thousands of pairs of counterfeit jeans would damage [the plaintiff’s] business reputation and decrease its legitimate sales.”). Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint and the submissions show that the goods produced and sold by Defendants are nearly identical to Plaintiff’s genuine products, Page 9 of 24 and consumers viewing Defendants’ counterfeit goods post-sale would actually confuse them for Plaintiff’s genuine products. See, e.g., Am. Compl. ¶ 85 (“Defendants’ actions are likely to cause confusion of consumers at the time of initial interest, sale, and in the post-sale setting, who will believe all of Defendants’ goods are genuine goods originating from, associated with, and/or approved by Plaintiff.”). Plaintiff has no adequate remedy at law so long as Defendants continue to operate the Subject Domain Names and Seller IDs because Plaintiff cannot control the quality of what appear to be its products in the marketplace. An award of monetary damages alone will not cure the injury to Plaintiff’s reputation and goodwill if Defendants’ infringing and counterfeiting continue. Moreover, Plaintiff faces hardship from loss of sales and its inability to control its reputation in the marketplace. By contrast, Defendants face no hardship if they are prohibited from the infringement of Plaintiff’s trademarks. Finally, the public interest supports the issuance of a permanent injunction against Defendants to prevent consumers from being misled by Defendants’ products, and potentially harmed by their inferior quality. See Chanel, Inc. v. besumart.com, 240 F. Supp. 3d 1238, 1291 (S.D. Fla. 2016) (“[A]n injunction to enjoin infringing behavior serves the public interest in protecting consumers from such behavior.”) (citation omitted); World Wrestling Entm’t, Inc. v. Thomas, No. 12-21018, 2012 WL 12874190, at *8 (S.D. Fla. Apr. 11, 2012) (considering the potential for harm based on exposure to potentially hazardous counterfeit merchandise in analyzing public’s interest in an injunction). Broad equity powers allow the Court to fashion injunctive relief necessary to stop Defendants’ infringing activities. See, e.g., Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Bd. of Educ., 402 U.S. 1, 15 (1971) (“Once a right and a violation have been shown, the scope of a district court’s equitable powers to remedy past wrongs is broad, for . . . [t]he essence of equity jurisdiction has Page 10 of 24 been the power of the Chancellor to do equity and to mould [sic] each decree to the necessities of the particular case.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)); United States v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Co., 321 U.S. 707, 724 (1944) (“Equity has power to eradicate the evils of a condemned scheme by prohibition of the use of admittedly valid parts of an invalid whole.” (citations omitted)). District courts are expressly authorized to order the transfer or surrender of domain names in an in rem action against a domain name. See 15 U.S.C. §§ 1125(d)(1)(C), (d)(2). However, courts have not limited the remedy to that context. See, e.g., Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. Otamedia Ltd., 331 F. Supp. 2d 228, 230 n.2 (S.D.N.Y. 2004) (transferring Yesmoke.com domain name to plaintiff despite the fact the plaintiff did not own a trademark in the term “Yesmoke” and noting 15 U.S.C. section 1125 “neither states nor implies that an in rem action against the domain name constitutes the exclusive remedy for a plaintiff aggrieved by trademark violations in cyberspace”); Ford Motor Co. v. Cross, 441 F. Supp. 2d 837, 853 (E.D. Mich. 2006) (ordering the defendants to disclose all other domain registrations held by them and to transfer registration of a particular domain name to plaintiff in part under authority of 15 U.S.C. section 1116(a)). Defendants have created an Internet-based counterfeiting scheme in which they are profiting from their deliberate misappropriation of Plaintiff’s rights. Accordingly, the Court may fashion injunctive relief to eliminate the means by which Defendants are conducting their unlawful activities. Appropriate remedies to achieve this end include ordering the cancellation or transfer of the Subject Domain Names to Plaintiff; removing the Seller IDs’ listings and images of goods; and requiring that the goods of each Defendant be surrendered to Plaintiff, such that these means may no longer be used as instrumentalities to further the sale of counterfeit goods. Page 11 of 24 Statutory Damages. In a case involving the use of counterfeit marks in connection with the sale, offering for sale, or distribution of goods, 15 U.S.C. section 1117(c) provides that a plaintiff may elect an award of statutory damages at any time before final judgment is rendered in the sum of not less than $1,000.00 nor more than $200,000.00 per counterfeit mark per type of good. See 15 U.S.C. § 1117(c)(1). In addition, if the Court finds Defendants’ counterfeiting actions were willful, it may impose damages above the maximum limit up to $2,000,000.00 per counterfeit mark per type of good. See 15 U.S.C. § 1117(c)(2). The Court has wide discretion to determine the amount of statutory damages. See PetMed Express, Inc., 336 F. Supp. 2d at 1219 (citations omitted). An award of statutory damages is appropriate despite a plaintiff’s inability to prove actual damages caused by a defendant’s infringement. See Ford Motor Co., 441 F. Supp. 2d at 852 (citations omitted) (“[A] successful plaintiff in a trademark infringement case is entitled to recover enhanced statutory damages even where its actual damages are nominal or non-existent.”); Playboy Enters., Inc. v. Universal Tel-A-Talk, Inc., No. 96-6961, 1998 WL 767440, at *8 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 3, 1998) (awarding statutory damages where plaintiff failed to prove actual damages or profits). The option of a statutory damages remedy in trademark counterfeiting cases is sensible given evidence of a defendant’s profits in such cases is frequently almost impossible to ascertain. See, e.g., S. Rep. No. 104-177, pt. V § 7, at 10 (1995) (discussing purposes of Lanham Act statutory damages); PetMed Express, Inc., 336 F. Supp. 2d at 1220 (statutory damages are “[e]specially appropriate in default judgment cases due to infringer nondisclosure”) (citations omitted). This case is no exception. Here, the allegations of the Amended Complaint and the evidence establish the Defendants intentionally copied one or more of the Spy Optic Marks for the purpose of deriving Page 12 of 24 the benefit of Plaintiff’s world-famous reputation. Defendants have defaulted on Plaintiff’s allegations of willfulness. See Am. Compl. ¶ 31; Arista Records, Inc. v. Beker Enters., Inc., 298 F. Supp. 2d 1310, 1313 (S.D. Fla. 2003) (finding a court may infer willfulness from the defendants’ default); PetMed Express, Inc., 336 F. Supp. 2d at 1217 (stating that upon default, well-pleaded allegations are taken as true). As such, the Lanham Act permits the Court to award up to $2,000,000.00 per infringing mark on each type of good as statutory damages to ensure Defendants do not continue their intentional and willful counterfeiting activities. The only available evidence demonstrates that each Defendant promoted, distributed, advertised, offered for sale, and/or sold at least one (1) type of good bearing at least one (1) mark which is a counterfeit of one of the Spy Optic Marks protected by federal trademark registrations. See Am. Compl. ¶¶ 15, 24–32, 47–51; Cook Decl. 11–15. Based on the above considerations, Plaintiff has asked the Court to award statutory damages in the amount of $1,000,000.00 against each Defendant. See Mot. [ECF No. 35] at 15–16. The award should be sufficient to deter Defendants and others from continuing to counterfeit or otherwise infringe Plaintiff’s trademarks, compensate Plaintiff, and punish Defendants, all stated goals of 15 U.S.C. section 1117(c). The Court finds that this award of statutory damages falls within the permissible range under 15 U.S.C. section 1117(c) and is just. See Fendi S.R.L. v. Joe Bag, No. 19-61356, 2019 WL 4693677 (S.D. Fla. Aug. 28, 2019) [ECF No. 43] (awarding plaintiff $1,000,000.00 against each defendant); Adidas AG v. Global Online Shopping, No. 19-61180 (S.D. Fla. 2019) [ECF No. 36] (awarding plaintiff $1,000,000.00 against each defendant); Louis Vuitton Malletier v. lv2014.skrar, No. 19-61015 (S.D. Fla. 2019) [ECF No. 40] (awarding plaintiff $1,000,000.00 against each defendant); Abercrombie & Fitch Trading Co. v. Artemis Gesdy, No. 19-60287 (S.D. Fla. 2019) [ECF No. 36] (awarding plaintiff $1,000,000.00 against Page 13 of 24 each defendant); Fendi S.R.L. v. socjmkfn, No. 19-61356 (S.D. Fla. 2019) [ECF No. 44] (awarding plaintiff $1,000,000.00 against each defendant); Goyard St Honore v. Agote, No. 1762276, 2018 WL 2006870 (S.D. Fla. Apr. 19, 2018) [ECF No. 49] (awarding plaintiff $1,000,000.00 against each defendant); Specialized Bicycle Components, Inc. v. 17 No.1-Own, No. 17-61201, 2017 WL 3016929 (S.D. Fla. July 14, 2017) [ECF No. 44] (awarding plaintiff $1,000,000.00 against each defendant). Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint also sets forth a cause of action for cybersquatting pursuant to the ACPA, 15 U.S.C. section 1125(d). As admitted by default, and established by the evidence submitted, Defendant Numbers 1–8 have acted with the bad-faith intent to profit from at least one of the Spy Optic Marks and the goodwill associated with the Spy Optic Marks by registering their respective Subject Domain Names which are identical, confusingly similar to, or dilutive of at least one of the Spy Optic Marks (“Cybersquatted Subject Domain Names”). See Am. Compl. ¶¶ 33–38, 62-68; Mot. at 29 (“Schedule B”). The Cybersquatted Subject Domain Name incorporates at least one of Plaintiff’s trademarks in its entirety surrounded by a descriptive or generic term, rendering the domain name nearly identical to at least one of Plaintiff’s trademarks. Upon a finding of liability, the ACPA expressly empowers the Court to “order the forfeiture or cancellation of the domain name or the transfer of the domain name to the owner of the mark.” See 15 U.S.C. § 1125(d)(1)(c); Victoria’s Cyber Secret Ltd. P’ship v. Secret Catalogue, Inc., 161 F. Supp. 2d 1339, 1356 (S.D. Fla. 2001). Accordingly, Plaintiff is entitled to the transfer and ownership of Defendant Numbers 1–8’s Cybersquatted Subject Domain Names because it is confusingly similar to at least one of Plaintiff’s trademarks. Page 14 of 24 Additionally, Plaintiff may elect at any time before final judgment to recover actual damages or statutory damages of not less than $1,000.00 and not more than $100,000.00 per domain name, as the Court considers just. See 15 U.S.C. § 1117(d). Plaintiff has elected statutory damages and requests in view of Defendant Numbers 1–8’s intentional, wrongful behavior, an award in the amount of $10,000.00 for its infringing domain name. See Mot. 18– 19; Taverna Opa Trademark Corp. v. Ismail, No. 08-20776, 2010 WL 1838384, at *3 (S.D. Fla. May 6, 2010) (awarding $10,000.00 in statutory damages for domain name at issue). The Court finds this amount is just. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff is entitled to the entry of final default judgment. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff’s Motion [ECF No. 35] is GRANTED. Default final judgment and a permanent injunction shall be entered by separate order. DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 22nd day of March, 2022. _________________________________ RODOLFO A. RUIZ II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Page 15 of 24 SCHEDULE “A” DEFENDANTS BY NUMBER, SUBJECT DOMAIN NAME, SELLER ID, FINANCIAL ACCOUNT INFORMATION, MERCHANT ID, INFRINGING PRODUCT NUMBER, AND E-MAIL Defendant / Financial Account Information: Defendant PayPal Merchant Infringing Product Subject Domain Name PayPal Account / Payee / Store Number ID Number / Additional Email Number / Seller ID QihuaLms87@outlook.com service@noreply.spfactoryou 1 spy-outlets.com langmanjgmiyo@gmail.com t.com xinyuandalj@outlook.com 2YNQGN249F42A service@noreply.spfactoryou 1 acvpe.shop LongQsss15@outlook.com t.com service@noreply.spfactoryou 1 mcdcown.shop KeLilusong@outlook.com t.com reeghandbsjgb@gmail.com service@noreply.spfactoryou 1 ralpher.site Yun-z Network Technology Co., KHRDTU7G5V3RN t.com Ltd LJiansf14@outlook.com service@noreply.spfactoryou 1 sp.rvpd.shop t.com reeghandbsjgb@gmail.com service@noreply.spfactoryou 1 spopsunglass.shop WguangXzx64@outlook.com t.com Yun-z Network Technology Co., 1 spyoptiglasses.shop KHRDTU7G5V3RN Ltd Yun-z Network Technology Co., 1 spy-optiglasses.shop KHRDTU7G5V3RN Ltd DuaneRigginsdlc@gmail.com service@noreply.spfactoryou 1 spysunglasses.shop t.com xionganyunze@outlook.com service@noreply.spfactoryou 1 spy-sunglasses.shop Weixyzzm80@outlook.com t.com cskwdzfdh649@outlook.com service@noreply.spfactoryou Sharp Liss Mall 1 xtydd.shop t.com Yun-z Network Technology Co., KHRDTU7G5V3RN service@dealsvipuw.shop Ltd spymensandwomenssun service@noreply.vipclientwe 2 Populargoods2021@outlook.com VPBBB3L87UKNW glasses.online b.com Fuyang Chuangmi Electronic 2 spyglasses.online VPBBB3L87UKNW Commerce Co., Ltd. spymensandwomenssun Fuyang Chuangmi Electronic 2 VPBBB3L87UKNW glasses.shop Commerce Co., Ltd. service@noreply.spvipcs.co 3 spysunglasss.shop Soyadgming@outlook.com m service@noreply.spvipcs.co 3 spsunglassi.shop mzguangxun@hotmail.com m SO YA Home Building materials 3 spyglasses.shop 5YXTF5MP942QW Co., Ltd Page 16 of 24 3 service@noreply.spvipcs.co m service@service.glassddmail. spyplusglasses.shop SufondiBusiness@outlook.com XB82FABLB5AEY com yichuanghua2265@outlook.com service@service.glassddmail. spyplussunglasses.shop com Dejapopulor@outlook.com service@service.glassddmail. spyprosunglasses.shop yuanxinhong520@outlook.com com lutherdesigninc@outlook.com service@noreply.bestretailsal spysunglasses.store vttantiusly@outlook.com PAV5EAJ668PGG e.com choiceGroupt@outlook.com 2Q5Y7XD5RT6VL highwaylifestyle@outlook.com cloudwelldeal@outlook.com service@noreply.bestretailsal spsunglassale.shop e.com Three Kingdoms Business Service PAV5EAJ668PGG (Chongqing) Co., Ltd. spyopglasss.shop bjylqdsmlx217@outlook.com 6 spysunglassi.shop LeiMoneys34@outlook.com 7 7 7 spyglassesdztr.shop spdai.shop spdfh.shop 7 spyglasses21.shop wangguanfang4100@hotmail.com YULBEJTZ8LUE8 Terence Online Centre YULBEJTZ8LUE8 Terence Online Centre YULBEJTZ8LUE8 FoshanBeldenshop@outlook.com U74DXH4TB3BLJ Terence Online Centre YULBEJTZ8LUE8 binlidatrading@outlook.com GTUQNMS8UYPC Y yishanclothingshop@outlook.com 3SYSBMF65RZEQ mantinggeclothing@outlook.com 9TQ2EPSSVU7VS 7 spyglasseswear.shop wangguanfang4100@hotmail.com YULBEJTZ8LUE8 7 spzth.shop wangguanfang4100@hotmail.com YULBEJTZ8LUE8 Chandler Outlet Shop Y9J89XE52FHPL EAPM79JPAs@outlook.com 7 spzzf.shop Terence Online Centre 4 4 4 5 5 7 7 7 LV8XE2QQX4TXL YULBEJTZ8LUE8 support@noreply.usglassessh op.com support@noreply.usglassessh op.com ZinaOwens2500@hotmail.com 8N6B3LJPJPPUC Farrell Fashion Market LAVDYHARMNG8 zhaolin5063wv@hotmail.com W support@noreply.usglassessh spysunglassesbsnc.shop lingfantradeshop@outlook.com S69RUAJQ682KE op.com ruimiaoclothingstore ruimiaoclothingstore@outlook.co AYTYK3T24S7U6 m xushuang1996815@outlook.com support@noreply.usglassessh fwysunglasses.xyz op.com YuanZhenhua9720@outlook.com GaoJincheng0201@outlook.com support@noreply.usglassessh noaglassesoutlet.online duanfei5847@hotmail.com T6PRHFMJA7DP6 op.com bethanypeterson38@hotmail.com E6CDQ9K6WZH72 Page 17 of 24 zhanglisha226@outlook.com zhouli9636@outlook.com 8 9 10 14 18 21 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 SDC33XZJPEMP8 VKXRZCTCMSS6 G W4BB4YRB8GD24 johnrussell5398@hotmail.com XiaoyuCommerceStore@outlook. 48YBJPZBSP8V6 com JaydaColeman880@hotmail.com CVZU66HDD4844 Hangzhou Miyou Trading spysunglassesopid.shop Company L5H9R97ELK7Q4 xuhongliang1977@outlook.com hancuimingfangshop@outlook.co 84WUZA72BZ2LN m tgbdm.shop crayfishsite@zoho.com.cn sale@tgbdm.shop support@noreply.ixglassessh xjhmyj.online Fr0i6hxivn9ELWR@outlook.com op.com Transaction ID: all_in_onestore 353497455468 5CE88951U7101741V Transaction ID: jackma21 284325842071 70P48822WR178905H Transaction ID: locas_6443 393407815919 6N973421KF253070U 88bar yitanghuameng22@163.com 194260700085 chonganstore chathumilakshan@gmail.com 393314084511 fanzhifandz@outlook.com 384062558634 fanshop88 Transaction ID: 384062558634 001121515L837603J canosacasa@gmail.com 174270267341 global-shop-online a/k/a subastas-outlet- Transaction ID: 174270267341 2000 48G31184JS6765017 globix.store narek719957@gmail.com 363324987853 hahaeveryday gao19851224ka@hotmail.com 324669771750 happyniuniu2019@aliyun.com 253757925740 happyniu2019 Transaction ID: 253757925740 8EH691478Y3982244 happysolutions happysolutions.zj@gmail.com 373554128163 maryord-14 timght@gmail.com 402754603639 tha_baby thababy987@gmail.com 133797341544 the_full_cart.store icontrolss99@gmail.com 265081772037 priyantha.kumara19890317@gma ukstorelk 265093620855 il.com universalestore99 razvanszalacsi@yahoo.com 384048024996 v*lianxstore*v guodonggeng1988@163.com 284250780141 Cycling Travel Store 900243034 1005001388699641 1005001345949234 Dian&Yang Store 5434117 4000649124725 Page 18 of 24 39 GOOOG Store 911239106 40 OANRAYS Store Phineed Sunglasses Drop Shipping Store Shop5023094 Store 4052093 41 42 4495053 5023094 43 Sunglasses Franchised 1452061 Store 44 URUS Store 45 Awesome Glasses Store 5798675 46 chengcheng Sunglasses 4033087 Store 47 48 3133026 GOOD SUNGLASSES 911908147 Store MG-SUNGLASSES 911757441 Store 49 RoadBlock Store 911032014 50 Shop5081471 Store 5081471 51 Shop900251481 Store 900251481 52 Shop911515004 Store 911515004 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 1005002091965733 1005001872859645 32969943538 1005002301760882 1005002301795675 1005001464791457 1005002300669941 1005002539362463 1005002539326773 1005002320327092 1005001471344671 1005002549002212 32891145534 32873124816 32884525314 Sunbright Sunglasses Drop Shopper Store WF Store WGESUN Store Ywjanp Store ZAIQING Store ZSMEYE Official Store danuelhouses dhgate_bagss dhgate_glasses dhgateclothing guomimenlu happydhgatestores 1005002547762105 1005002348393871 1005002719478226 1005001692280821 1005001708266561 1005002136925298 1005002137018039 1005001557924283 1005002092047673 1005002109821602 1005003088913605 1005002819632831 1005002488104343 1005002487928865 1005002487953798 911790020 1005002390845265 4445007 911773151 4639086 5427086 32926023003 1005002932195393 32959547173 4000325606340 4215017 1005001616975103 21635550 21661176 21661179 21661172 15749601 21609010 664599247 688783944 688782742 688941880 449066521 629298204 Page 19 of 24 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 hermane kingclothings kingfashionmall kingqueenhair kingsunglasses ladyqueens mingsdhgateso qy8sunglasses skywatchs superbagss troydaniels hopesunglasses ppfashionshop 78 Ailefent Lemeng Taiger 5ec26d4aa6438b57a5042fbe 79 80 81 Banbudadada Best of Tumblr briqoghve 5b3091657752c8045c725e64 601fa7f6044fbb2d0c901c97 5e5b4954f5995fcdddce110d 82 chcan23 5ebf375bbf13a520032b35a6 84 85 86 586fbd8b8c30e82bdcce557d 5fa0d10433a6743e629e86db 5f58944614f157568adff656 586e3c438c30e8093e5c6bc3 5f4383a96cd8f977eb6782af 88 89 90 91 92 93 Fashion taste of life fghyhcfue gaoshan Store Happy shopping GOGOGOGO hnxiaodong1027 jntajtjmtj Just For You Baby likuibaihuopu meiqingmuxiu mengmenga 671141868 688786877 688785777 688784272 688782804 688820767 673141382 662100612 688782499 688994631 671814594 402274523 412716568 605806b53a6f62b168a0d254 605c3106dcda4feba2d1bd13 60668f80f2a102b79d31f7e4 606565719f5f961d4f5fb613 6076b1868cec4da62d734fcb 607e8d0f880029352d9033df 60586083735a5f953c4af1ea 606b32b62c207bdd160e4e93 607c3fd52d2ceee395db22a0 606dcecb0e715f594ef10f56 60abf8ac423bda26dbd10344 5f43839ff371645631d37bf9 60628b628a5caf64de3931e4 606c6cf901f55a576636d422 603f54b4c45b713b857d534d 5b0243a37d4d84171b90b7fe 5837fc7e0299bc07d974a4da 5e5e17df6a6aff18ea64f93b 5d7f4382b6b4c23c83cceb46 5d831e6422e7777c42dc187e 94 Neuroscience Online 601fac7b4eeb7304eab94012 95 96 97 98 99 nixiao QHU78SHI qinmingjingpinpu sadweqd22 shiqiaofengya 5941185a20d56c1aaf9ccd6d 5d5b867e283abc43e94a3320 5e5f910ca6757d1882435a7c 5d5b44a634037d39c521bca3 5d7f50a48c8dc70a40b96bf4 100 SHUTEBO4 5aaf8ab8b9605f1f0501e064 6052e42bd3e0b009f7083308 6051bb522b1c9d3b3840e609 60795b08c89f6d79bc265664 605d5159711b379ef828d244 606d5e472329ed5608fd6704 604864b3bdcaa4ba10641c41 6064188d3f9f2b5b41a17d3d 6051a6971b25d3f4f5a2ba3b 606c4c9b76908ce4a4530181 60826ba1ca26625c5a067cd3 6059acc2000beb93a5d0f99f 6073e37e9391ad3779706b74 60655ca591bc9d06d7fff27c 606edf0216bd9eeef7c9477f 606558a016d8a100d1f4f747 6073d9a9a6b2fb23cb0e837d 87 20329350 21661145 21661189 21661187 21661174 21661185 21641914 21639619 21661133 21661184 21635198 20732060 20765093 Page 20 of 24 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 111 112 113 114 Shuwak Bairand Qilasrert smeathebphd sooplight tuesdrtg uzice wangzhikun666 Warmspringsun Week bar WLH store zfyyouth0101 zhaohaofeng apilooking neutrally fly 115 MISSGU 59771e8fc7f5051ea2f6674e 116 117 118 119 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 czyouth2029 tatalo115 luoxiansheng bingbadaoao Zhaozhao2 NB yi duo-guo Game & Toys krhs 44j6trw 89gagky nkjdvv Yoogamer ZZML aijia-liuxin wenchenggongzhu enjoy oneself nice 1212ZX KOUYB761 QIYYY12 vidmhjf iandgero xinyuxiaodian baueklus qinmingzahuopu qinmingjingpin guanshengzahuo grieiydebso 59e99bab5d6f343c89a617e6 5abc92364215952aaf9e949b 5abfcdaea6f62e41d1698be6 5b02226b66ca1b177872dcb0 5b2cb14c5676c3789521c70d 5b4da960d5dbc2205d4422e0 5b90b3d08d567673376780ac 5d3f1660e4b65d62081e7379 5d42c9ab8388970cf92a26c4 5d43e8124c78556cc1e59ba1 5d43f95170327a6cea6831d7 5d491d667ad2420a41ba4b13 5d50d8507ad242504df71fbd 5d626d3127367804f6ad691f 5d7dc08a8c8dc75f83888523 5d7f4d2a2888354bc2398112 5d821eb71c4dc67a24f4983d 5d82d3dc7e8eba597d35cdae 5d88241a8c8dc7531846c080 5d8c5fed7137803c00f0cd88 5e211bed54e85f0645e903ef 5e3693d5e489d51c6c965ccd 5e590c271c24e498554bb3ca 5e5b50936ac64ed6bef9d7b0 5e5f81bcec5cd32a4141320e 5e5f8a2ac422b90ddf57dc0b 5e5f9f7ea6757d426b430299 5e6089e2cdcecef095820158 101 5ec8f713f3f35248964b9e36 60580f25406b07a1f58892b2 5e96ad30ecbf9d3a78765f37 57d12217c496d10fd6a706fd 5e37a660a548d5447592acbd 5fcf5bbbf7b2025cb191b7df 5e5098947b7ddf054069a67e 5af6901c7824ca1f63417eef 576f43c1007370740c4bed34 587a23db0366d00cb28dd4f1 5a38a7d512fa1c56af8f093a 584833b3582efa13144a8364 58a56b643a8c36510ee68041 59205c7e81f8e7245bf5140e 5f6ac45c6b2e4b0a49e0d2a0 6064174781ef15589b5ee7de 6056f3df094529d668b7168a 606aa8791c34b45835e881d4 5ff9751b4f35c096b78aa941 606eae330b72966cec7a5872 5f4383b6045f830039e4c868 5f37de71b4faef0051293e04 607948fb08e3be45290b9bde 60ae657419e6fdfe1d215358 6085131ced0358ee18154813 60cc6e4d0f8ea26a65f71f56 6065427005ea2db96c78c519 60f0fd7fd3c058554fb83dc7 6094b32ca5410564d08a03a7 60bad77d8f1da43a81e1f1f9 608688312c450d6b0e62935e 608a1bcee76a660e831249e1 60667a43afcf635ea99a0036 6093541df484137aa5ce156c 606563578f61401a85d399ef 60af2bdcc8611502546de40d 609a43fc4878deed03450421 606c283bf4ee697c73b7dcc9 60655e1e4dd35e0628d0ddd9 606d15242133e28db22f4ae6 609b8e0de60c465636037cac 60cc23a41da1f1ca823a7ae6 6114c2ab1c541f519cd74951 60dfdfc151488ac5aa996a66 60654237fc05b4bb845d9541 60826b84df16f1400d4b874a 606680db3b7c5386534dadba 606c01119c5b33125161530a 606556513fa761f05cd99ec3 60cabd743ae6ceb7267ca0cf 607a78ea68dc6e2242f89dcf 60cabca6a444b9ab2c2c409d 6059ac9aa924ffa78997d4e8 60713d8dd3d4c732bddc8c17 606ea34b5996913f9bef211b 609cbbf6c295327826236e64 60b8b38045bdf62c28ba09e6 Page 21 of 24 146 zhangqingbaihuo 5e60eb50cce71246311386d7 147 dongpingxiaodian 5e61c752c6cc3a12cd89d456 148 rannujoqge 5e670ba2589024313913f491 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 Autumn Vogelx wfh09 YunraojidL YHJWAN Antonioza znufcu guss6g4q0oc4 mclasetfvvo daffitbljfau teeteightvju thotethoby titateskixles losekkgy slithesbnoosj sheshiriemc nesheighoyroe patitoughmexaa mcshoorefkhiqp toatasuqpff shockoufs Marilynyya CharlesUUa Terraaa angelaaaa Lisaaaa Luisaa TracyAnneaa Amyaa Brianaa 5e685212f2699a321ec3cd28 5e6932d72fb13fe3c20a9328 5e6ce5171e1985070025312b 5e71dafedada4f0047d046e0 5e7472d64e1e8233d02c17c7 5e78cb3b4fed550ec06652f8 5e80b477e273cd57004b2f81 5e904d4e9bbc2b09428f055f 5e93647f46be6ad700df1e05 5e93779ca93effe22247901c 5e937c14a93effe4cf4790b0 5e958aee0bd69706e2155a5d 5e958c4365a1793001fc9822 5e958e8edc7da93bdb768103 5e958efadc7da93bb47681f1 5e958f7f3b55ac02001a4abd 5e958ff94ebef1398df4ec82 5e9590e6fbe93c37856fcb83 5e959a26ec27b440dbcb9bfc 5e96c11e058b714c78edc5e6 5e987135920fc8bad4f28db0 5e992ab629e7861e74d267ef 5e9967bbeece7658c06696fb 5e9968e95ca37f2315577c7b 5e996d6229e7866629d2668a 5e9970eaeece7632026724c2 5e997707f4479b8161df335a 5e9977d2eda468830dbeb3f2 5e9979e85ca37f31ce577c1f 178 Williamaaee 5ea2501173900e124a7c8a56 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 Markaaee Oliviaaaee pataaee Senbeneng cots torowivens mjtyj iposter6653 5ea255eec8d26d16c0e98755 5ea2563641e7f02f7aad7cdd 5ea25926e34afe0440dfba96 5efebc2892285a6b467c5878 5f06aa9ab730762c440effa6 5f2e4481a1eaf802e8b78a55 5f40969136d382840e1a4517 Page 22 of 24 60655d35c633db023a4f0fc9 61249a61f9af80226d64591d 606c3de698a6ffc498d74012 60cc3c81cc44fb02093fc83f 605ef017b9efaf464af56a66 606fedcb03c36b31b85d80ca 607ec6e47839f8b763074697 5f655c24491d290040e36ef0 607d3de9a357035eea00e68c 6094ef60111b0200ed21286c 60fbb7304e7c0a4e100a0b12 6121c606a160fbccc4d44813 60cc2503ae0654db16f36f29 60ee8ec5b61b6968c6d04b40 608506bfdaf5b3ff07164a70 60201c591138a6ca7141f8e5 608ebc174304ef7e0d0bdeae 60c4e4721a1b83b1c02ec32e 5f655c005c090f2ac6e8cb19 5f655c059c952d30e879f880 5f655bfa6e695630c625c979 5f655bfbd868940040745a64 5f655bfc329c60004f0e33a8 5f655bfdd6d5b82ebf282987 5f655bfe6b556513890a4b20 5f6ac49696703b003eda2d95 5f655c26377fb73330945be7 5f655c088ab312311a7f7025 5f655bf943b3a13285201104 5f655c208ab31234237f628e 5f655c0a03764d003dbfaa04 5f655c0c7348d12d8ad245d1 5f655c22d696590045b0e126 5f655c0e2745750df87cebf3 5f655c0798368f34ddb34d41 5f655c06cd8a68378dfc5149 602012bd1473460050b5de2 d 5f70b469eb378c2929694683 5f655bebc3bc7f318d9091eb 5f655bee5616ce3131b19000 608b66d90e71d539c563c2d0 608af6fe06c6761c756eb5eb 60f7d578477be8bd4792ce7d 60c4834a25c5611d54189876 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 Shoperan 5f427ee829e78637230587fa MariaJeans 5f43227d29e7863e700587ac HTHRT 5f4648a006543fd4db394ffc Porron shop 5f51c81603c06e25012e1e9c Ronald david barrios 5f6b57683e645b3d7658ffcd Variedades Yuli 5f6bd4374cc3885930be9f66 Creaciones jbelen 5f6be07bd2741989f75fadc6 Oxirisplayolv 5f6e2b0aa498d577a735ed90 Catshop.vicky 5f73d18ade6a5337a8ce3c55 facilitoandre2 5f7425a009237cbea0ba738f zhanggang68 5f7eaa9d498e2b10ea8fa7a1 Market Truts Crosk 5f7fa03f1689b500505d28a3 hangyungjian 5f7ff538e64ad803fc562f9e hybridization 5f8db7ba19a61afb83f6c187 laevulose 5f8dbe1fc525e5b69c1dab83 Dickens 5f8dd4661c80850d30f16476 QISHENE 5f8f5f56de940f07c2c7ff6e ganocephala 5f8fc15843db78e4bcc9cf73 Eviegive 5f9192a5446a0d8f7fd5f823 Sigdsjcvhjc 5f9220d319c41e1a0c1bf23d SxCN 5f9a3e3e59048313bdf857a2 francia y paris 5f9b00ba2a917a027d8af5a4 pedritoperes212 5f9b11370e46e935f1c80381 lacasadeloshuevosdeoro 5f9b3a4359048374c9f85630 prendamayoress 5f9b3caa8a161ae5c85ca898 Novedades Irene S 5f9b49f8c934d70467f27640 Brocylon 5f9b59a1c934d7112cf2766e Oswaldo food fast 5f9c61a323aaec7e83a51b7b online inversiones auto 5f9d87766535343487d4faa1 cauchos Desordenados 5f9f5d1116ae6905d12c21b5 huangdan1980 5f9f8afc6535341cf9d4f940 lindos mares 5fc2ff9c10cec6db8f6735c5 Qacmary 5fc601fabee3db6dac044a31 Serbeiro 5fcbc49491d2e50dd476120d County Seat 5fcc38adb3d3424f52d1c73a Superior Interactive 5fcc66d88540d181e21e64b6 Galaxy Man Man 5fcc67f2b3d34273aed1c7eb Veramons 5fcc6a4368d20e77eba1acd3 Purity 88 5fcceeb6c68845038e77ccef Alibean 5fcd447991d2e542df76115e burguerazul 5fce93f991d2e587f676117c nativeeast 5fce985f1b3ca391133a2a3a bosscosmetics 5fce9e7ab1d5b403205f45cf Page 23 of 24 60c663b13c367a6e1d1f684d 608bb147e9c150ddaa86e108 60b476290a785b18f3cc6b73 607a036bb64f2aac661b4bfd 6081e44af36d5bf2886fda47 6086315571569021208bafde 6080875d11c3497a0bcd89df 607d2ab7afb4dc058c8d0e3e 609097ef8e747b90139674c5 607911e754dd90af7503ee59 606c5f014ef5751bec9c78cd 607f7696988fd8005e95b242 606c5dcc4859a50d60e2910a 60c3fa43d18ef90632d8284d 60dfd8697c6203ca979b1957 611a44f4c6b3c700771d3244 6078115b545859cdedde69cb 603dd94074d102a1472fd87d 60a1e8f11370de24003cb533 60a1e8811fada4a2f5aa042f 6073af4c1e4351b434eeaca6 6090adf8d16a618fd05a3da4 607e30c0519b5147ea16c9e1 60853ce8ff1c29f0695ae6a8 606b7360852e0faa27fd9134 60807944992aca259c6a89ee 607c5d4163e3dbddcefe99c1 605e67e421ad6db221fd331f 607dff536760324444e4ea5a 608da6295a5e6d0b7fc23b6c 60d591b35d9786008d0e88f8 608be7a4b5c8885e30366b8a 60f4dbe1c3c1845199b8ae8d 60ad8b3a30a15f005dd36571 607a69158bafeefc582109a8 6077ce40d434ae05313d1535 607a694ef15349fedcd0d428 60797f9d096afeed47734d8b 607a69341b9755f4a5dc12b7 60a9b6deb55e040ec7c02e6d 60c083f5dac04a4e521c539a 60b7b74ed4405e1a2aa70439 60bea024144bf930a7bb9232 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 Ghombro Pasardo Store Tobys St-tore Store My Tinos Anime_MyS Elizabetbus Impulsively Charlesparkle Heavenly4 Cauthias Jaycjohnso Lovvly dtryeuy Creative and novel shop WANGZ4599CFCF zhaojihua2412 tianfengxia3628 Sand Corruptions wangyujun896 chongzhiauu tkbx1122 Johsonxi wangxiaofei223368 5fd1e5f149eb683a3d8a794e 5fd26b828145f8200fa527b3 5fd28366e2ffdf350da7c044 5fd28a6280265a004af9709f 5fd29fdc53011c10b704b692 5fd3ad5dc64c70acd276ab30 5fd3c06f58cd77c3d6e7f65c 5fd5226a7885461cb1393636 5fd79922c4fa1b3faa6300ef 5fd7cca74706208bd3206bc3 5fd8161c8076461c3fbfcdf4 5fda974856a431861eef123e 5fe2e5eaf35ecb61eff524ae 60b42786daa7bdbd5055d734 60b57724d81faf6dcce0685c 60b4b62109a1a9ee98352152 60aed9506c645945b5b3ffac 60b56a3d40d411290a570585 60bf07a0b5e81dd844a9c213 60dd08f4d5cc565f3bb09726 60ce20fb12d62d54f333c42b 60bf06ce4cbb11c99c04b467 60d2c86fe4f5ed566b4da291 60c23f7beca8eaeda7117f8f 60cd104be6ea27ca2d098c42 60a3703db4922f88b09d52d2 600f6d62bc5d790f90f74a6b 6077c8913d7953f653688a87 6040771586290b0bc09c72dd 604d74659d156e5eaf1d7457 6064066a7603f804dca5f32b 6064ee0a28856b004262c9f2 60682a6ae08c778173ae24be 60727f5b0e3b2992bfd4403b 6077d22ceaf4c85900af739d 60927ab4854dbf530c7231ed 609b5337e6e60f2306254001 608167ce57dcb1da65378a24 60865c126315badbd8b957a1 60faa730a5eb40863d390a1d 60ba1a4dcf3883674b945f59 60adabda07fc2d5a7dd6d08f 609366712de88751e2af3a7c 60963017a54105e88c89feaf 60cc3b40bf9c8bf2821b3765 60d2ae1a411d610046ae8530 Page 24 of 24

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.