United States of America v. Reisman, No. 0:2011cv62653 - Document 16 (S.D. Fla. 2012)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER granting 14 Motion for Summary Judgment. All pending motions are denied as moot. This case is CLOSED. Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on 6/25/2012. (ir)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 11-62653-Civ-MARRA/BRANNON UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT REISMAN, Defendant. __________________________/ FINAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AGAINST SCOTT REISMAN IN ACCORDANCE with the Court s Order and Opinion granting Summary Judgment against Scott Reisman signed on this date, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff, United States of America, and against Defendant, Scott Reisman. Plaintiff shall recover from Defendant the sum of $84,115,86 of unpaid principal, $83,476.69 of unpaid interest as of the date of this judgment, and $30.00 in fees for service of the summons per 28 U.S.C. § 2412(b). This award shall accrue post-judgment interest at the rate1 of 0.19%, for which let execution issue. 1 The federal interest statute, 28 U.S.C.A. § 1961, governs the award of postjudgment interest. 28 U.S.C.A. § 1961(a) provides that [i]nterest shall be allowed on any money judgment in a civil case recovered in a district court. . . Such interest shall be calculated from the date of the entry of the judgment, at a rate equal to the weekly average 1-year constant maturity Treasury yield, as published by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, for the calendar week preceding the date of the judgment. That rate is 0.19%. In addition, Newman & Marquez, P.A. is awarded its reasonable attorney s fees. The appropriate motion for such fees and costs must be filed pursuant to Local Rule 7.3. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 25th day of June, 2012. _________________________ KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge Page 2 of 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.