Brook et al v. United States of America, No. 0:2008cv60314 - Document 64 (S.D. Fla. 2009)
Court Description: *CORRECTED Amended Final Judgment. Amended Final Judgment (D.E. 63) is vacated due to typographical error. Signed by Judge Ursula Ungaro on 5/8/2009. (lc2)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Brook et al v. United States of America Doc. 64 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-603 14-CIV-UNGARO CHRISTOPHER BROOK and LYNN BROOK, Plaintiffs, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. I CORRECTED AMENDED FINAL JUDGMENT THIS CAUSE came before the Court in a non-jury trial from February 4,2009 to February 5,2009 and February 9,2009 to February 11,2009, and the Court entered Final Judgment in favor of Plaintiff Christopher Brook and Plaintiff Lynn Brook in the amount of $1,522,069.36 and $150,000.00 respectively.' Following the Court's entry of Final Judgment, Defendant filed a Motion Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52 and Motion Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59, and this Court has entered an Order on that motion, granting it only to the extent that Plaintiffs' award of post-judgment interest shall be clarified. Consistent with this Court's Order, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that final judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff Christopher Brook and against Defendant United States of America, in amount of One Million Five Hundred Twenty-Two Thousand and Sixty-Nine Dollars and Thirty-Six Cents ($1,522,069.36), upon which post-judgment interest shall accrue in accordance with Section 1 Final Judgment was entered on February 18,2009 (D.E. 40). Dockets.Justia.com 1304(b)(l)(A) of Title 3 1. For sums which, let execution issue. It is further ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that a final judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff Lynn Brook and against Defendant United States of America, in amount of One Hundred and Fifty Thousand Dollars ($150,000), upon which interest shall accrue in accordance with Section 1304(b)(l)(A) of Title 3 1. For which sums which, let execution issue. It is further ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Court reserves jurisdiction to tax attorneys fees and costs upon motion presented by Plaintiffs. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this -8th- day of May, 2009. TRICT JUDGE copies provided: counsel of record
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
