Hearn et al v. McKay et al, No. 0:2007cv60209 - Document 239 (S.D. Fla. 2008)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT in favor of the remaining non-defaulting Defendants, Thomas Bethel, Donald Nilsson,Daniel Smith,Donald Cree, Joseph Gremelsbacker, and Robert Kiefer against the Plaintiffs, John N,Heam, Christopher O. Bartlett, John Rouselle, Timothy Harkins, and Henry P.Mallon. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 10/28/2008. (tp)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Hearn et al v. McKay et al Doc. 239 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Miami Division Case Number: 07-60209-CIV-MARTINEZ-BROWN JOHN N. ("JACK") HEARN, CHRISTOPHER O. BARTLETT, JOHN ROUSSELLE, TIMOTHY HARKINS, AND HENRY P. MALLON, Plaintiffs, vs. MICHAEL MCKAY et.al., Defendants. _____________________________________/ FINAL JUDGMENT Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58 and in accordance with the reasons stated in the Court's Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law (D.E. No. 238), judgment on Count II, the only remaining claim in this case, is entered in favor of the remaining non-defaulting Defendants, Thomas Bethel, Donald Nilsson, Daniel Smith, Donald Cree, Joseph Gremelsbacker, and Robert Kiefer and against Plaintiffs, John N. Hearn, Christopher O. Bartlett, John Rouselle, Timothy Harkins, and Henry P. Mallon. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 28 day of October, 2008. _______________________________________ JOSE E. MARTINEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Copies provided to: Magistrate Judge Brown All Counsel of Record Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
