GAMMON v. MCNEIL, No. 5:2009cv00053 - Document 15 (N.D. Fla. 2009)

Court Description: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 14 MOTION for Final Judgment filed by ALPHANEE B GAMMON: It is recommended that Petitioner's Motion be DENIED. Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 6/10/2009. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on May 13, 2009. (cc: Gammon) (cbj)
Download PDF
GAMMON v. MCNEIL Doc. 15 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION ALPHANEE B. GAMMON, Petitioner, vs. Case No. 5:09cv53/RH/EMT WALTER A. McNEIL, Respondent. ________________________________/ REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION This habeas corpus action brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is before the court on Petitioner’s “Motion for Final Judgment” (Doc. 14). Petitioner essentially seeks a default judgment on the ground that Respondent was directed to file an answer on or before May 3, 2009, and failed to do so (id.). Initially, the basis for Petitioner’s request for a default judgment is frivolous. On March 3, 2009, the court directed Respondent to file an answer to the habeas petition within sixty (60) days (Doc. 9). On May 5, 2009, the court granted Respondent’s motion for extension of time, thereby extending the deadline to June 18, 2009 (Doc. 13). Because Respondent has not failed to plead or otherwise defend this action within the time limitation established by the court, Petitioner is not entitled to a default judgment. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 55. Additionally, the Eleventh Circuit has held that default judgments are inappropriate in habeas corpus cases. Aziz v. Leferve, 830 F.2d 184, 187 (11th Cir. 1987) (“[A] default judgment is not contemplated in habeas corpus cases. . . .”).1 1 Other circuits agree. See, e.g., Lemons v. O’Sullivan, 54 F.3d 357, 364–65 (7th Cir. 1995) (“Default judgment is an extreme sanction that is disfavored in habeas corpus cases.”); Gordon v. Duran, 895 F.2d 610, 612 (9th Cir. 1990) (“The failure to respond to claims raised in a petition for habeas corpus does not entitle the petitioner to a default judgment.”); Allen v. Perini, 424 F.2d 134, 138 (6th Cir. 1970) (concluding that default judgments are not available in habeas corpus proceedings, and that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55 pertaining to entry of default judgment is not applicable in habeas corpus cases). Page 2 of 2 Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED: That Petitioner’s “Motion for Final Judgment” (Doc. 14) be DENIED. At Pensacola, Florida this 13th day of May 2009. /s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE NOTICE TO THE PARTIES Objections to these proposed findings and recommendations may be filed within ten (10) days after being served a copy thereof. Any different deadline that may appear on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only, and does not control. A copy of objections shall be served upon the magistrate judge and all other parties. Failure to object may limit the scope of appellate review of factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. § 636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d 698, 701 (11th Cir. 1988). Case No. 5:09cv53/RH/EMT