HALL v. SANTA ROSA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION et al, No. 3:2006cv00351 - Document 198 (N.D. Fla. 2009)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 190 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - 1) The 120 motion for summary judgment filed by Dfts LEAVINS, SUTTON, and JOHNSON is granted. 2) The 179 motion for summary judgment filed by Dfts GIELOW and SANFORD is granted. 3) Pla's Third Amendment claim is dismissed as frivolous. 4) The clerk shall enter final judgment in favor of all Dfts. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE ROGER VINSON on 9/4/2009. (laj)

Download PDF
HALL v. SANTA ROSA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION et al Doc. 198 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION O’DELL HALL, JR., Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 3:06cv351/RV/EMT LT. LEAVINS, et al., Defendants. ____________________________/ ORDER This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Fifth Report and Recommendation dated August 18, 2009 (Doc. 190). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. The magistrate judge’s Fifth Report and Recommendation (Doc. 190) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. 2. The motion for summary judgment filed by Defendants Leavins, Sutton, and Johnson (Doc. 120) is GRANTED. 3. The motion for summary judgment filed by Defendants Gielow and Sanford (Doc. 179) is GRANTED. 4. Plaintiff’s Third Amendment claim is DISMISSED as frivolous. 5. The clerk shall enter final judgment in favor of all Defendants. DONE AND ORDERED this 4th day of September, 2009. /s/ Roger Vinson ROGER VINSON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.