Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 8:2012cv02395 - Document 21 (M.D. Fla. 2014)

Court Description: ORDER adopting 20 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Complaint filed by Michael G. Williams. The decision of the Commissioner is affirmed. The Clerk of Court shall enter a final judgment in favor of Defendant Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of the United States Social Security Administration and close this case. Signed by Judge Elizabeth A. Kovachevich on 2/4/2014. (JM)

Download PDF
Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security Doc. 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION MICHAEL G. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 8:12-CV-2395-T-17AEP CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of the United States Social Security Administration, Defendant. / ORDER This cause is before the Court on: Dkt. 20 Report and Recommendation In this case, Plaintiff Michael G. Williams sought judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying Plaintiffs claim for Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income. The assigned Magistrate Judge has entered a Report and Recommendation in which it is recommended that the decision of the Commissioner be affirmed. The Court has carefully reviewed the pleadings, and Administrative Record. (Dkt. 12). No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed. After consideration, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation, which is incorporated herein by reference. Accordingly, it is Dockets.Justia.com Case No. 8:12-CV-2395-T-17AEP ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated; the decision of the Commissioner denying benefits to Plaintiff Williams is affirmed. The Clerk of Court shall enter a final judgment in favor of Defendant Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of the United States Social Security Administration, and close this case. DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, in 'fgmnpa, Florida on this 4th day of February, 2014.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.