Comprehensive Care Corporation v. Katzman et al, No. 8:2009cv01375 - Document 337 (M.D. Fla. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER denying 333 Dr. Katzman's Motion for Advancement, or in the alternative, for Final Judgment on Indemnification. Signed by Judge Susan C Bucklew on 1/28/2011. (REE)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Comprehensive Care Corporation v. Katzman et al Doc. 337 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION COMPREHENSIVE CARE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 8:09-cv-1375-T-24 TBM JERRY KATZMAN, Defendant. _________________________________/ JERRY KATZMAN, JARED KATZMAN, LEE KATZMAN, and MICHELLE KATZMAN, Counter-Plaintiffs, v. COMPREHENSIVE CARE CORPORATION, Counter-Defendant. _________________________________/ ORDER This cause comes before the Court on Dr. Katzman’s Motion for Advancement, or in the alternative, for Final Judgment on Indemnification. (Doc. 333). Comprehensive Care opposes the Motion. (Doc. 336). Dr. Katzman moves this Court for advancement of legal fees and expenses incurred in litigating this case, or in the alternative, for final judgment on indemnification. In its Order Denying Dr. Katzman’s Amended Motion for Summary Judgment, dated July 30, 2010, this Court denied Dr. Katzman’s claim for advancement. (Doc. 215 at 23). Dockets.Justia.com Additionally, Dr. Katzman currently has a motion pending before this Court for final judgment as to indemnification. (Doc. 315). Thus, the instant Motion is duplicative and a waste of the Court’s time and resources. Accordingly, Dr. Katzman’s Motion for Advancement (Doc. 333) is DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED at Tampa, Florida, this 28th day of January, 2011. Copies to: Counsel of Record 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
