Campbell v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Lee County), No. 2:2023cv00973 - Document 10 (M.D. Fla. 2023)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER re: 9 MOTION for Summary Judgment, 8 MOTION for Clarification re 4 Opinion and order, 5 Judgment. Campbell's motions (Docs. 8 and 9) are denied. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 11/27/2023. (BGS)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION REMOI CAMPBELL, Petitioner, v. Case No.: 2:23-cv-973-SPC-KCD SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant. / OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court are Petitioner Remoi Campbell’s Motion for a More Definite Statement (Doc. 8) and Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 9). The Court dismissed Campbell’s habeas petition because it did not state any habeas claims, and because Campbell did not exhaust post-conviction remedies in state court. Both of Campbell’s one-page motions express general disagreement with the dismissal. Campbell’s motions explicitly request compensation, attorney fees, appointment of counsel, and a “more definite statement.” These requests are frivolous—Campbell does not state any conceivable ground for entitlement to those remedies. To the extent Campbell seeks reconsideration of the dismissal, that implied request also lacks merit. Reconsideration of a prior order is an extraordinary measure that should be applied sparingly. Adams v. Beoneman, 335 F.R.D. 452, 454 (M.D. Fla. 2020). Campbell does not state any valid ground for reconsideration. Accordingly, Campbell’s motions (Docs. 8 and 9) are denied. DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on November 22, 2023. SA: FTMP-1 Copies: All Parties of Record 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
