Sussman v. Harris et al, No. 2:2023cv00461 - Document 22 (M.D. Fla. 2023)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER. Sussman's Amended Complaint is not ripe for consideration. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 9/7/2023. (BGS)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Sussman v. Harris et al Doc. 22 Case 2:23-cv-00461-SPC-KCD Document 22 Filed 09/07/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 138 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION DAVID CHARLES SUSSMAN, Plaintiff, v. Case No.: 2:23-cv-461-SPC-KCD SHEVAUN HARRIS, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, WELLPATH and RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, LLC, Defendants. / OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court are Plaintiff David Charles Sussman’s Amended Complaint (Doc. 20) and Notice of Inquiry (Doc. 21). On August 21, 2023, the Court dismissed Sussman’s initial complaint, entered judgment, and closed this case. (Docs. 17 and 19). A plaintiff seeking leave to amend after entry of judgment must first seek and obtain relief from the judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) or 60(b)(6). Friedman v. Market Street Mortg. Corp., 520 F.3d 1289, 1293 n.4 (11th Cir. 2008). Sussman has not done so. Accordingly, Sussman’s Amended Complaint is not ripe for consideration. Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:23-cv-00461-SPC-KCD Document 22 Filed 09/07/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 139 DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on September 7, 2023. SA: FTMP-1 Copies: All Parties of Record 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
