Primo Broodstock, Inc. v. American Mariculture, Inc. et al, No. 2:2017cv00009 - Document 242 (M.D. Fla. 2019)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER denying 208 Motion for Leave to Amend the Complaint; adopting and incorporating 229 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 11/8/2019. (RKR)

Download PDF
Primo Broodstock, Inc. v. American Mariculture, Inc. et al Doc. 242 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION PB LEGACY, Corporation USA, LLC, INC, a and TB Texas FOODS Plaintiffs, v. Case No: 2:17-cv-9-FtM-29NPM AMERICAN MARICULTURE, INC., a Florida corporation, AMERICAN PENAEID, INC., a Florida corporation, and ROBIN PEARL, Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on consideration of the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. #229), filed October 17, 2019, recommending that plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend the Amended Complaint (Doc. #208) be denied. No objections have been filed and the time to do so has expired. After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject or modify the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. 636(b)(1); 28 U.S.C. § Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1112 (1983). In the absence of specific objections, there is no requirement that a district judge review factual findings de novo, Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 Dockets.Justia.com (11th Cir. 1993), and the court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings and recommendations. 636(b)(1). 28 U.S.C. § The district judge reviews legal conclusions de novo, even in the absence of an objection. See Cooper-Houston v. Southern Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); Castro Bobadilla v. Reno, 826 F. Supp. 1428, 1431-32 (S.D. Fla. 1993), aff’d, 28 F.3d 116 (11th Cir. 1994) (Table). After conducting an independent examination of the file and upon due consideration of the Report and Recommendation, the Court accepts the Report and Recommendation of the magistrate judge. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. #229) is hereby adopted and the findings incorporated herein. 2. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend the Amended 8th day of Complaint (Doc. #208) is DENIED. DONE and ORDERED at Fort Myers, Florida, this November, 2019. Copies: Hon. Nicholas P. Mizell United States Magistrate Judge Counsel of Record - 2 -

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.