Felton v. USA, No. 2:2016cv00884 - Document 38 (M.D. Fla. 2018)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER in the abundance of caution, the Clerk shall re-docket re: 34 MOTION for leave to appeal in forma pauperis/affidavit of indigency as a notice of appeal and forward to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 6/5/2018. (SLU)

Download PDF
Felton v. USA Doc. 38 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION TAVARES FELTON, Petitioner, v. Case No: 2:16-cv-884-FtM-38CM USA, Respondent. / OPINION AND ORDER1 This matter comes before the Court on Petitioner's Affidavit Accompanying Motion for Permission to Appeal In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 34) filed on April 24, 2018. Although not the model of clarity, it appears that Petitioner wishes to file a Notice of Appeal in connection with a public records request he made to the Fort Myers Police Department. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: In the abundance of caution, the Clerk shall re-docket Petitioner's Affidavit Accompanying Motion for Permission to Appeal In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 34) as a notice of appeal and forward it to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. 1 Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or websites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users’ convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other websites, this Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their websites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their websites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court. Dockets.Justia.com DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida this 5th day of June, 2018. SA: FTMP-1 Copies: All Parties of Record 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.