Shird et al v. The Commissioner of Social Security, No. 2:2008cv00472 - Document 23 (M.D. Fla. 2009)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER accepting and adopting 20 Report and Recommendations. The Decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is remanded to the Commissioner pursuant to sentence four so the Commissioner can re-open/continue the hearing; allow plain tiff the opportunity to cross examine Dr. Rabinowitz; allow plaintiff to continue his presentation of testimony and evidence; re-consider plaintiff's residual functional capacity and the use of the Grids, if necessary; and take such further steps as are necessary to properly resolve the claim. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close the file. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 6/10/2009. (RKM)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION PETER L. SHIRD, Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 2:08-cv-472-FtM-29SPC MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ___________________________________ OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on consideration of Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell s Report and Recommendation (Doc. #20), filed on May 26, 2009, recommending that the Commissioner s decision to deny social security disability benefits be remanded with instructions to consider an issue. the Commissioner to further No objections have been filed, and the time to do so has expired. The Court reviews the Commissioner s decision to determine if it is supported by substantial evidence and based upon proper legal standards. Crawford v. Comm r of Soc. Sec., 363 F.3d 1155, 1158 (11th Cir. 2004). Substantial evidence is more than a scintilla but less than a preponderance, and is such relevant evidence as a reasonable person would accept as adequate to support a conclusion. Moore v. Barnhart, 405 F.3d 1208, 1211 (11th Cir. 2005); Crawford, 363 F.3d at 1158. Even if the evidence preponderates against the Commissioner s findings, the Court must affirm if the decision reached is supported by substantial evidence. at 1158-59. Crawford, 363 F.3d The Court does not decide facts anew, make credibility judgments, reweigh the evidence, or substitute its judgment for that of the Commissioner. Moore, 405 F.3d at 1211; Dyer v. Barnhart, 395 F.3d 1206, 1210 (11th Cir. 2005). The magistrate judge, district judge and appellate judges all apply the same legal standards to the review of the Commissioner s decision. Dyer, 395 F.3d at 1210; Shinn v. Comm r of Soc. Sec., 391 F.3d 1276, 1282 (11th Cir. 2004); Phillips v. Barnhart, 357 F.3d 1232, 1240 n.8 (11th Cir. 2004). The Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) found that plaintiff was disabled beginning March 12, 2007. No one disputes this finding. The ALJ also found that plaintiff was not disabled from September 15, 2004, his claimed onset date, to March 11, 2007. Plaintiff challenges that portion of the ALJ s Decision. The Court agrees with the Report and Recommendation s findings and conclusion that the ALJ properly weighed the medical opinions in the record. far, that the The Court also agrees, on the record developed so ALJ s finding concerning plaintiff s residual functional capacity is supported by substantial evidence and that use of the Grids was proper. The Court further agrees that the case must be remanded to the Commissioner to continue/re-open the hearing before the ALJ. initial hearing was terminated -2- because of upon an The equipment malfunction while plaintiff s counsel was examining plaintiff. Plaintiff had not finished his testimony, and the ALJ stated that he would reconvene the hearing at another time to allow counsel to finish his questioning. The equipment was not fixed and the hearing was terminated, but the hearing was not reconvened by the ALJ. Instead, a report from Dr. Rabinowitz was obtained and relied upon by the ALJ in his Decision. Thus, whether viewed as re- opening the hearing after obtaining the report of another physician or as completing the truncated hearing, a remand is required. On remand, plaintiff shall have the opportunity to cross examine Dr. Rabinowitz as to his new report, as set forth in the Report and Recommendation. Additionally, since the testimony of plaintiff was never completed, on remand plaintiff shall be allowed to complete his testimony. Further, after considering the additional testimony and evidence, the ALJ may need to reconsider plaintiff s residual functional capacity and the use of the Grids. Dr. Rabinowitz found plaintiff s use of a cane was medically necessary, and if the evidence establishes the need for a cane prior to March 12, 2007, the ALJ cannot use the Grids to deny benefits as to this time period. (11th Cir. 1987). Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: -3- Walker v. Bowen, 826 F.2d 996 1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. #20) is accepted and adopted by the Court. 2. remanded The Decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is to the Commissioner of Social Security pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. ยง 405(g) so that the Commissioner can re-open/continue the hearing; allow plaintiff the opportunity to cross examine Dr. Rabinowitz; allow plaintiff to continue his presentation of testimony and evidence; re-consider plaintiff s residual functional capacity and the use of the Grids, if necessary; and take such further steps as are necessary to properly resolve the claim. 3. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly and close the file. DONE AND ORDERED at Fort Myers, Florida, this June, 2009. Copies: Hon. Sheri Polster Chappell U.S. Magistrate Judge Counsel of Record -4- 10th day of
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
