JACKSON v. USA, No. 1:2018cv01828 - Document 18 (Fed. Cl. 2019)
Court Description: REPORTED OPINION: The Court hereby GRANTS the Government's motion to dismiss. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment. Signed by Senior Judge Nancy B. Firestone for Senior Judge Edward J. Damich. (sh) Service on parties made.(Plaintiff served via certified mail; Article No. 7018 0040 0001 1393 4311)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
JACKSON v. USA Doc. 18 Jn tbe Wniteb tates Court of feberal [laitns No. 18-1828T (Filed: May 16, 2019) ************************************* * * WILLIAM P. JACKSON, * * Plaintif, * * v. * * THE UNITED STATES, * * Deendant. * ************************************* Tucker Act; Subject Matter Jurisdiction; Tax; Motion to Dismiss; Tax Reund; Wrongul Levy; Deamation; Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress; Fith Amendment Taking; Due Process; Tort. William P. Jackson, Stark City, MO,pro se. Sophia Sidiqui, U.S. Department of Justice, Tax Division, Court of Federal Claims Section, Washington, D.C., with whom were Richard . Zuckerman, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, David l Pincus, Chief, Court of Federal Claims Section, or Deendant. OPINION AND ORDER DAMICH, Senior Judge. On November 6, 2018, Plaintif, William P. Jackson ("Mr. Jackson"), actingpro se, iled a Complaint with this Court alleging that the United States, or a contractor of the United States, placed a "raudulent Notice of Federal Tax Liens" on his property, which caused him to lose a large client and caused his business sales to drop. Comp!. at 1-2. Mr. Jackson seeks damages of $2,663,312.30. Comp!. at 3. On February 28, 2019, Defendant, the United States ("the Government"), iled a Motion to Dismiss or lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 12(b)( l) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims ("RCFC"). ECF No. 10. On March 26, 2019 Mr. Jackson iled his response. ECF No. 11. On April 12, 2019, the Government replied. 1 ECF No. 12. 1 On May 1, 2019, the Court dismissed Plaintiffs complaint pursuant to RCFC Rule 41 because Plaintif ailed to pay the mandatory iling ee or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis. On May 13, 2019, the Court received Plaintifs iling ee. Thereore, on May 16, 2019, the Comt granted Plaintiffs motion to reopen the case. 7018 0040 0001 1393 4311 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
