DEMOS v. USA, No. 1:2015cv01058 - Document 4 (Fed. Cl. 2015)
Court Description: Opinion and Order denying 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment. Signed by Judge Elaine D. Kaplan. (dls) Copy to parties.
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
DEMOS v. USA Doc. 4 ORIOINAI. lJntltt @nitel $rtatts @ourt of frlrrsl @lsimg FILED Pro Se ocl - I ) JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR., ) Plaintifl ) ) ) ) THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. 2015 U.S. COURT OF FEDERAL CI.AIMS No. l5-1058C (Filed: October 1,2015) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) OPINION AND ORDER On September 18,2015, Plaintiff (who is incarcerated) filed a complaint in the United States Coufi of Federal Claims along with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. In the federal courts, proceedings in forma pauperis are govemed by 28 U.S.C' $ 1915. Under $ 1915(g), a prisoner may not bring an action proceeding in forma pauperis if the prisoner: [H]as, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. Mr. Demos easily clears this bar. see Final order, Demos v. united States, No. 07-28C (Fed. Cl. Feb.22,2007) (Braden, J.) (discussing nine actions or appeals filed by Mr. Demos that were dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, and dismissing his complaint under $ 1915(g)); see also Demos v. Keating, 33 F. App'x 918, 919-20 (lOth cir.2002) (describing Mr. Demos as a "most frequent filer" who had filed over 134 lawsuits throughout the United States as of 2002). Thus, under $ 191 5(g), he may not bring this action proceeding in forma pauperis. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is directed to DISMISS Plaintiff s complaint without oreiudice. Dockets.Justia.com ,: IT IS SO ORDERED. Judge
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
