WOUBETU v. PAT HANDY LEGACY SHELTER et al, No. 1:2023cv00945 - Document 3 (D.D.C. 2023)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 4/20/2023. (zrtw)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
WOUBETU v. PAT HANDY LEGACY SHELTER et al Doc. 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SAMSON WOUBETU, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) PAT HANDY LEGACY SHELTER, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) Civil Action No. 23-0945 (UNA) MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on consideration of plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis and pro se complaint. The Court grants the application and, for the reasons discussed below, the dismisses the complaint. A pro se litigant’s pleading is held to less stringent standards than would be applied to a formal pleading drafted by lawyer. See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that a complaint contain a short and plain statement of the grounds upon which the Court’s jurisdiction depends, a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and a demand for judgment for the relief the pleader seeks. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). The purpose of the minimum standard of Rule 8 is to give fair notice to the defendants of the claim being asserted, sufficient to prepare a responsive answer, to prepare an adequate defense, and to determine whether the doctrine of res judicata applies. Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). 1 Dockets.Justia.com Plaintiff, who currently resides at a homeless shelter, alleges that another resident stole his pants as well as the cash and keys in the pockets. See Compl. at 1. He further alleges that shelter staff refused to help him with this incident and another incident where plaintiff’s Bible, books, jacket and papers were stolen. See id. Missing from the complaint is a statement establishing a basis for this Court’s jurisdiction. This defect, along with the complaint’s failure make a clear statement of claim and demand for relief, warrant dismissal of the complaint for failure to comply with the minimum pleading standard set forth in Rule 8(a). A separate order will issue. /s/ TANYA S. CHUTKAN United States District Judge DATE: April 20, 2023 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
