SPENCER v. GREYHOUND BUS LINES, INC., No. 1:2023cv00799 - Document 4 (D.D.C. 2023)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Jia M. Cobb on 05/09/2023. (zsl)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
SPENCER v. GREYHOUND BUS LINES, INC. Doc. 4 Case 1:23-cv-00799-UNA Document 4 Filed 05/09/23 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PRINCESS MARIA SPENCER, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. GREYHOUND BUS LINES, INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. 23-0799 (UNA) MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on review of this pro se plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis and her civil complaint. The Court has reviewed the plaintiff’s complaint, keeping in mind that complaints filed by pro se litigants are held to less stringent standards than are applied to formal pleadings drafted by lawyers. See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that a complaint contain a short and plain statement of the grounds upon which the Court’s jurisdiction depends, a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and a demand for judgment for the relief the pleader seeks. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). The purpose of the minimum standard of Rule 8 is to give fair notice to the defendants of the claim being asserted, sufficient to prepare a responsive answer, to prepare an adequate defense and to determine whether the doctrine of res judicata applies. Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). In conclusory fashion, plaintiff alleges she “was discriminated against, stalked, and [subjected to] hate crime while riding Greyhound buses and in Greyhound terminals.” Compl. at 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:23-cv-00799-UNA Document 4 Filed 05/09/23 Page 2 of 2 1. For example, plaintiff alleges she “was almost attacked once” and was exposed to “persons playing the witchcraft/voodoo game[,]” id., Ex. (ECF No. 1-1) at 2, while travelling on unspecified dates through multiple states, see id., Ex. at 3. She also alleges that she was overcharged. See id. Plaintiff demands “restitution for and/or pain and suffering in the amount of 17 trillion dollars[.]” Compl. at 1. As drafted, the complaint fails to meet the minimal pleading standard set forth in Rule 8. The complaint does not state a basis for this Court’s jurisdiction and a cogent statement of an actual legal claim. So few facts are alleged that no defendant reasonably could be expected to prepare a proper response to the complaint. The Court will grant the plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) and will dismiss the complaint and this civil action without prejudice. An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is issued separately. DATE: May 9, 2023 /s/ JIA M. COBB United States District Judge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
