SHERVEN v. PRIVACY AND CIVIL LIBERTIES OVERSIGHT BOARD, No. 1:2022cv02412 - Document 12 (D.D.C. 2023)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION re: 10 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Please see the attached Memorandum Opinion for additional details. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 1/31/2023. (lcapm2)

Download PDF
SHERVEN v. PRIVACY AND CIVIL LIBERTIES OVERSIGHT BOARD Doc. 12 Case 1:22-cv-02412-APM Document 12 Filed 01/31/23 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) MATTHEW J. SHERVEN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Case No. 22-cv-2412 (APM) PRIVACY AND CIVIL LIBERTIES ) OVERSIGHT BOARD, ) ) Defendant. ) _________________________________________ ) MEMORANDUM OPINION In this action brought under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), Defendant Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board moves to dismiss on the ground that pro se Plaintiff Matthew Sherven failed to exhaust administrative remedies. Def.’s Mot. to Dismiss, ECF No. 10. Despite receiving notice from the court, see Order, ECF No. 11, Plaintiff did not respond to the motion. The court has reviewed Defendant’s motion de novo and agrees that this matter must be dismissed because Plaintiff did not exhaust administrative remedies. “[A] requester under FOIA must file an administrative appeal within the time limit specified in an agency’s FOIA regulations or face dismissal of any lawsuit complaining about the agency’s response.” Wilbur v. Cent. Intel. Agency, 355 F.3d 675, 676 (D.C. Cir. 2004) (internal quotation marks omitted). Here, Plaintiff received a final determination on his FOIA request on August 8, 2022. Compl., ECF No. 1, at 1. Defendant’s regulations provide that an administrative appeal must be filed “within 90 calendar days after the date of the letter denying [the] request.” 6 C.F.R. § 1001.7(b) (2017). Plaintiff, however, bypassed an administrative appeal and filed suit on August 13, 2022. See Compl. This matter is therefore dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:22-cv-02412-APM Document 12 Filed 01/31/23 Page 2 of 2 For the foregoing reasons, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 10, is granted. A separate, final order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion. Dated: January 31, 2023 Amit P. Mehta United States District Court Judge

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.