SPENGLER v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, No. 1:2020cv02345 - Document 7 (D.D.C. 2021)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 3/16/2021. (adh, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
SPENGLER v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES Doc. 7 Case 1:20-cv-02345-UNA Document 7 Filed 03/16/21 Page 1 of 2 FILED 3/16/2021 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MICHAEL R. SPENGLER, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Petitioner, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, Respondent. Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy Court for the District of Columbia Civil Action No. 20-2345 MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on petitioner’s application to proceed in forma pauperis and his pro se civil petition for a writ of mandamus. The petitioner allegedly “was injured in his business” when individuals “com[m]ercially burglarized [his] business locations” in California. See Pet. at 2. Consequently, petitioner states, these individuals “seized control of [petitioner’s] bank accounts” and other of the businesses’ assets, and “used them to facilitate . . . fraud” and to commit other unlawful acts including conspiracy and forgery. Id. Petitioner “places no blame on the [respondent],” and he “is not suing [respondent].” Id. at 3. He only asks the Attorney General “to intervene by way of civil & criminal investigative means & action[.]” Id. The Court cannot grant the relief petitioner seeks, as “a writ of mandamus is not available to compel discretionary acts.” Cox v. Sec’y of Labor, 739 F. Supp. 28, 30 (D.D.C. 1990) (citing cases). The decision to investigate a particular matter or to prosecute a particular case is left to the Executive Branch of the government, not the judiciary. See Heckler v. Chaney, 470 U.S. 821, 831 (1985) (noting that “an agency’s decision not to prosecute or enforce, whether through civil or criminal process, is a decision generally committed to an agency’s absolute discretion”); 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:20-cv-02345-UNA Document 7 Filed 03/16/21 Page 2 of 2 United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683, 693 (1974) (acknowledging that the Executive Branch “has exclusive authority and absolute discretion to decide whether to prosecute a case”). The Court will grant petitioner’s application to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss without prejudice the petition and this civil action. An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is issued separately. /s/ AMIT P. MEHTA United States District Judge DATE: March 16, 2021 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
