BUTLER v. SAUL, No. 1:2020cv01919 - Document 15 (D.D.C. 2021)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re Defendant Andrew M. Saul's 14 Consent Motion to Remand to Social Security Commission. For the reasons stated herein, the Court GRANTS the Defendant's Motion to Remand. The final decision of the Commission er is reversed, and this matter is remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings, pursuant to sentence four of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). In light of this order, the Court further DENIES AS MOOT Plaintiff's 13 Motion for Judgment of Reversal. See Memorandum Opinion and Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robin M. Meriweather on 06/09/2021. (lcaw)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
BUTLER v. SAUL Doc. 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HARRY BUTLER, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW M. SAUL, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 20-1919 (RMM) ) ) ) ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Harry Butler (“Plaintiff” or “Mr. Butler”) seeks reversal of a decision by the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration in which an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) denied Mr. Butler’s application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. See Compl., ECF No. 1. Upon written consent of the parties, this case was referred to the undersigned for all purposes. See Apr. 12, 2021 Min. Order. On May 12, 2021, Mr. Butler moved for judgment of reversal (“Motion for Judgment of Reversal”). See Pl.’s Mot. J. Reversal, ECF No. 14. On May 27, 2021, Defendant Andrew M. Saul (“Commissioner”) moved, with Mr. Butler’s consent, for entry of judgment that reverses the Commissioner’s final decision and remands this matter for further administrative proceedings, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (“Motion to Remand”). See Def’s Mot. Remand, ECF No. 15. Upon remand, the parties agree that the ALJ should (1) further develop the record, if necessary, (2) offer Mr. Butler an opportunity for another hearing, and (3) issue a new decision. See id. at 1. Dockets.Justia.com Under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the Court has the power “to enter, upon the pleadings and transcript of the record, a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the decision of the Commissioner, with or without remanding the cause for a hearing.” Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296 n.1 (1993). Having considered the parties’ submissions,1 the relevant case law and statutory provisions, and the record of this case as a whole, the Court GRANTS the Commissioner’s Motion to Remand. The final decision of the Commissioner is reversed, and this matter is remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings, pursuant to sentence four of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Further, given this order granting the Commissioner’s Motion to Remand, the Court DENIES AS MOOT Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment of Reversal. 06/09/2021 Date: _____________ 1 Signed: ____________________ Pl.’s Mot. J. Reversal; Def.’s Mot. Remand. 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
