DRIEVER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al, No. 1:2019cv01807 - Document 30 (D.D.C. 2020)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION in support of 29 ORDER granting 13 15 Defendants' Motions to Dismiss; denying 19 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend/Correct and Motion for Hearing. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Kelly on 10/19/20. (lctjk2)

Download PDF
Dockets.Justia.com UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Plaintiff et al. Defendants MEMORANDUM OPINION pro se I. Background A. Statutory and Regulatory Background DRIEVER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al Doc. 30 Id. See See id Id. id. Id. Id. id id. Id. B. This Lawsuit Id. See id. Id. Id. id. Id. See See id. See pro se id id. See See id See II. Legal Standards Sparrow v. United Air Lines, Inc. Schnitzler v. United States Haines v. Kerner Browning v. Clinton See Lujan v. Defs. of Wildlife Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am. See Artis v. Greenspan only Haase v. Sessions Ashcroft v. Iqbal Id. Id. See EEOC v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial Sch. de facto Coll. Sports Council v. Gov't Accountability Office see Belizan v. Hershon See Richardson v. United States III. Analysis Foman v. Davis A. Parties 1. Driever’s Proposed Class Action and Additional Plaintiffs pro se See Martin-Trigona Georgiades v. . pro se DeBrew v. Atwood Id. in forma pauperis See Asemani v. USCIS Id. Id. See Fleming v. Medicare Freedom of Info. Grp Fleming v. Ratliff Fleming v. Riehm See Fleming v. United States 2. Unknown Government Employee Defendants see pro se in forma pauperis B. Constitutional Claims See id Rhames v. United States Washington Hilton Hotels Metro. Area Transit Auth. v. Ragonese Corp. v. Weaver cert. denied identified See International Shoe Co. v. Washington First Chicago Int’l v. United Exch. Co., 1. Injunctive and Declaratory Relief Honig v. Doe Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife Id City of Los Angeles v. Lyons See ; City of Los Angeles O’Shea v. Littleton Id. See Zakiya v. United States Dearth v. Holder see also Clapper v. Amnesty Int’l 2. Monetary Damages a. Official Capacity Claims Kentucky v. Graham United States v. Mitchell Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Meyer Settles v. U.S. Parole Comm’n b. Individual Capacity Claims Bivens individual Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics Bivens Bivens Tyler v. D.C. Housing Auth. Twombly Corr. Servs. Corp. v. Malesko Bivens Wilson v. Libby Bivens Bivens Bivens see Davis v. Passman see Carlson v. Green Mejia-Mejia v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Bivens Ziglar v. Abbasi Bivens id. Bivens See Bivens Bivens Bivens Bivens Davis Carlson Bivens Ashcroft v. Iqbal Lucas Bush v. Bivens Davis v. Passman Carlson See Minneci v. Pollard see also Wilson v. Libby Bivens Bivens Abbasi Bivens See id. see also Corr. Servs. Corp. Abbasi now See Id. Bivens Bivens Mejia-Mejia Bivens Id. Abbasi Bivens Klay v. Panetta Bivens Bivens See See Malley v. Briggs see also Pearson v. Callahan Olim v. Wakinekona see Sandin v. Conner Franklin v. District of Columbia See, e.g. Mack v. Sample Bivens appeal dismissed C. Statutory Claims 1. Religious Freedom Restoration Act Webman v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons Abbasi see Singh v. Carter Tanzin v. Tanvir see Tanvir v. Lynch Tanvir v. Tanzin Tanzin See Webman Moses v. Howard Univ. Hosp 2. Administrative Procedure Act Id. non-monetary see id. Cohen v. United States See See 3. Reno v. Koray Federal Tort Claims Act See McNeil v. United States see also GAF Corp. v. United States Id. Smith v. Clinton aff’d See Booth v. Churner See Lineberry v. BOP IV. Conclusion

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.