MCNAIR v. BOP et al, No. 1:2019cv00885 - Document 12 (D.D.C. 2019)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION accompanying the final order issued separately this day. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 10/23/19.(ah)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
MCNAIR v. BOP et al Doc. 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JIMMIE MCNAIR, Plaintiff, v. U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 19-cv-885 (TSC) MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending is the United States Bureau of Prisons’ Motion to Dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(3) for improper venue, ECF No. 9. Plaintiff, appearing pro se, has not opposed the motion by the court-imposed deadline of September 23, 2019, see Order, ECF No. 10, nor has he requested more time to do so. For the following reasons, the Court will grant defendants’ motion and dismiss the case. Plaintiff is a former federal prisoner residing in Bowie, Maryland. He has sued the Bureau of Prisons and a dentist who allegedly treated him at the Federal Correctional Institution in Fairton, New Jersey. Plaintiff seeks monetary damages for “emotional distress, pain [and] suffering, . . . misrepresentations and lack of adequate medical attention.” Compl. at 1. The complaint does not include a jurisdictional statement, but defendants have reasonably considered it as arising under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671-80. See Mem. of Points and 1 Dockets.Justia.com Authorities at 1-2; Compl. Attachment (final agency decision denying Administrative Claim for personal injury). The FTCA’s venue provision requires that a claim be brought “only in the judicial district where the plaintiff resides or wherein the act or omission complained of occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1402(b). By his silence, plaintiff has conceded that (1) he “resides in Maryland,” and (2) “[t]he events giving rise to this litigation occurred in New Jersey.” Defs.’ Mem. at 3. Therefore, the Court agrees that this venue is improper, and dismissal is appropriate. A separate order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion. Date: October 23, 2019 Tanya S. Chutkan TANYA S. CHUTKAN United States District Judge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
