PITT v. DUKE, No. 1:2017cv02466 - Document 24 (D.D.C. 2021)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM AND OPINION in support of 23 Order granting Defendant's 17 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Kelly on 3/5/2021. (lctjk1)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Dockets.Justia.com UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Plaintiff Defendant MEMORANDUM OPINION I. Background Id. PITT v. DUKE Doc. 24 Id. Id. Id. Id. II. Legal Standard Lopez v. Council on Am.-Islamic Relations Action Network, Inc. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett Lopez Holcomb v. Powell Id. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. Anderson Montgomery v. Risen Id. Celotex Id. Pollard v. Quest Diagnostics III. Analysis Barnette v. Chertoff McDonnell Douglas Id. White v. Vilsack Brown v. Brody Czekalski v. Peters McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green Brady v. Office of Sergeant at Arms St. Mary’s Honor Ctr. v. Hicks Id. A. PSA Positions in Arkansas and Washington, D.C. See Holcomb v. Powell See, e.g. Bell v. Donley see also id. Id. , see i.e. Chavers v. Shinseki see also Brown v. Dep’t of Veterans Affairs Adeyemi v. District of Columbia Jackson v. Gonzales see also Gold v. Gensler Jackson, . Adeyemi Id. would Hayes v. Sebelius Holcomb see also Bell Washington v. Chao id. individual Whitener v. England Brown v. Henderson Horvath v. Thompson Whitener see also Horvath Whitener e.g. B. PSA Positions in Atlanta Id. i.e. Id. did Id. 4 see . Cf. Evans v. Sibelius See Scott v. Harris IV. Conclusion
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
