NURRIDDIN v. PEREZ et al, No. 1:2016cv01036 - Document 38 (D.D.C. 2018)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION in support of 37 Order granting Defendants' 13 Motion to Dismiss the Plaintiff's Amended Complaint and denying as moot Plaintiff's 27 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction and 35 Motion to Seal Exhibit. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Kelly on 8/30/2018. (lctjk1)
Download PDF
Dockets.Justia.com UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Plaintiff et al. Defendants MEMORANDUM OPINION pro se, et seq NURRIDDIN v. PEREZ et al Doc. 38 Background A. FECA Id. See id. Id. sua sponte Id. Id. Williams v. Tapella accord see also id. Hall v. DOL Id. see also Lockheed Aircraft Corp. v. United States id. id. Id. See Grant v. Dep’t of Treasury B. Factual Background See Nurriddin v. Goldin aff’d sub nom Nurriddin v. Griffin Id. See Nurriddin v. Bolden aff’d Id. See generally Nurriddin see See Cf. Nurriddin v. Bolden Id. ¶ Id. See id. Id. ¶ sua sponte Id. id. Id. Id. See Id. See id. Id. Id. Id. id. see id. Id. Id. See Id. C. Procedural Background et seq. id. id. id. id. Nurriddin v. Bolden Id. Legal Standard . Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am. Id. Kaplan v. Cent. Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran Sinochem Int’l Co. v. Malay. Int’l Shipping Corp. Troupe v. Att’y Gen. of U.S. Coal. for Underground Expansion v. Mineta Herbert v. Nat’l Acad. of Scis Knapp Med. Ctr. v. Hargan Feldman v. FDIC see Gulf Coast Mar. Supply, Inc. v. United States see Schubarth v. Fed. Republic of Germany pro se pro se Coleman v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp. Gomez v. Aragon Analysis See A. Claims against DOL Id. Id. Id. Id. 1. FECA Claims See Hall Lindahl v. OPM id. See, e.g., Gibbs v. United States Ramirez v. Walker Rae v. United States 2. Constitutional Claims See See id. Hall Lepre v. DOL see also Gallucci v. Chao aff’d Czerkies v. DOL See Lepre v. DOL Czerkies Id. Czerkies some Id. Czerkies Lepre Id. See Hamilton v. Acosta pro se Lepre Charles v. DOL Lepre Schwartz v. DOL Ramirez Czerkies, a. Procedural Due Process Claims Lightfoot v. District of Columbia Propert v. District of Columbia Stuto v. Fleishman See Prestop v. Hamlett Czerkies Lightfoot Gallucci Cleveland Bd. Of Educ. v. Loudermill Id. Hudson v. Palmer Schwartz see also Lepre, Gallucci See Id. See deprivation See supra id. See Gallucci Al-Beshrawi v. Chao See, e.g., Hall Scott v. Solis See See Cf. Ralph v. DOL Gallucci Loudermill See see also Id. post See See see id. see See sua sponte Id. Cf. Prestop v. Hamlett b. Equal Protection Claims Ramirez See Munn v. DOL aff’d 3. APA Claims Staacke v. U.S. Sec’y of Labor Califano v. Sanders See id. Gallucci B. Claim against OPM See id. Wacks v. Reich et seq. United States v. Fausto Id. Gallo v. United States aff’d Id. Fausto Elgin v. Dep’t of Treasury see Duch v. Potter Fausto grants Id. Fausto Worthington v. United States Id. Meester v. Runyon See id. see also Cf. Gallo Elgin Id. See supra see also Califano Justice v. Koskinen Inc. Winter v. Nat’l Res. Defense Council, aff’d Univ. of Tex. v. Camenisch Koskinen see also Venezia v. Robinson See, e.g. United to Protect Democracy v. Presidential Advisory Comm’n on Election Integrity Am. Freedom Law Ctr. v. Obama aff’d Conclusion Appalachian Voices v. Bodman