RHODES v. WELLS FARGO BANK, NA, No. 1:2016cv00767 - Document 16 (D.D.C. 2017)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION accompanying final order issued separately this day. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 1/13/17.(ah)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
RHODES v. WELLS FARGO BANK, NA Doc. 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Patrice Rhodes, Plaintiff, v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Defendant. : : : : : : : : Civil Action No. 16-0767-CKK MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff filed this action to obtain her alleged portion of the settlement reached in United States of America v. Wells Fargo Bank, No. 12-cv-01150 (JDB) (D.D.C. Sept. 21, 2012). See Compl. [Dkt. # 1]. Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss pursuant to subsections 1, 3, 5 and 6 of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b) [Dkt. # 9]. Plaintiff has not complied with the Court’s Order [Dkt. # 14] by responding to defendant’s motion by December 30, 2016, and she has not requested additional time to respond. Consistent with the advisements in the August 31, 2016 Order [Dkt. # 11], the Court finds that plaintiff has conceded defendant’s argument that she “is not entitled to enforce the Consent Order entered into by the United States and Wells Fargo because she was not a party to that action.” Def.’s Mot. at 8. Therefore, defendant’s motion will be granted and this case will be dismissed under Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. A separate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion. __________s/s__________________ COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY United States District Judge Dated: January 13, 2017 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
