SORRELL v. PAIGE INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC., No. 1:2015cv02004 - Document 45 (D.D.C. 2021)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION in support of 44 Order granting Defendant's 31 Motion for Summary Judgment and denying Plaintiff's 37 Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Kelly on 5/27/2021. (lctjk1)

Download PDF
Dockets.Justia.com UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Plaintiff Defendant MEMORANDUM OPINION Background SORRELL v. PAIGE INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC. Doc. 45 Id. Id. Id. Id. Id. Id. Id. Id. Id. Id. Id. Id. Id. Id. See Id. See Id. Id. See Id. id. Legal Standard Lopez v. Council on Am.-Islamic Relations Action Network, Inc. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. Pollard v. Quest Diagnostics Analysis A. Age Discrimination and Retaliation Claims (Counts 3, 4, and 7) Gross v. FBL Fin. Servs., Inc. McDonnell Douglas DeJesus v. WP Co. Dougherty v. Cable News Network Hall v. Giant Food, Inc. Moss v. Hayden See Rogers v. Washington Metro. Area Transit Auth. Columbia Grimes v. District of e.g. See Moss See B. DCHRA Race Discrimination Claim (Count 7) et seq. Id. Ellis v Georgetown Univ. Hosp. Rush v. Fed. Nat’l Mortg. Ass’n also aff’d see Cf. Palacios v. MedStar Health, Inc. D.C. Office of Human Rights C. Title VII and Section 1981 Race Discrimination Claims (Counts 1 and 5) Ayissi-Etoh v. Fannie Mae McDonnell Douglas See Telesford v. Maryland Provo-I Med. Servs., P.C. White v. Vilsack Brown v. Brody Czekalski v. Peters McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green Brady v. Office of Sergeant at Arms St. Mary’s Honor Ctr. v. Hicks Id. e.g. Id. Id. Id. See Holcomb v. Powell Id. Figueroa v. Pompeo Id. Burley v. Nat’l Passenger Rail Corp. Id. See See Holcomb Wheeler v. Georgetown Univ. Hosp. et seq e.g. See See Holcomb See See does See, e.g. Hazen Paper Co. v. Biggins Chavers v. Shinseki See U.S. ex rel. Windsor v. DynCorp, Inc. cf. Danielsen v. Burnside-Ott Aviation Training Ctr., Inc. see also see also See See George v. Leavitt Fischbach v. D.C. Dep’t of Corr. D. Title VII, Section 1981, and DCHRA Retaliation Claims (Counts 2, 6, and 7) See Ali v. District of Columbia Howard Univ. v. Green Burlington N. & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. White CBOCS West, Inc. v. Humphries McDonnell Douglas See Durant v. D.C. Gov’t Carney v. Am. Univ. Ali v. District of Columbia Howard Univ. v. Green Winston v. Clough Carney see also Ali Holcomb Jones v. Bernanke see also Crawford v. Metro. Gov’t of Nashville & Davidson Cty., Tenn. Burlington material Wiley v. Glassman Burlington see also Arafi v. Mandarin Oriental Ali 1. Failure to Provide Employment Documentation see Bridgeforth v. Jewell Durant Burlington See Bridgeforth See Gray v. Foxx see Camara v. Mastro’s Rests. LLC Durant 2. Termination Threat did See Gray McNair v. District of Columbia Baloch v. Kempthorne see also Berger v. Iron Workers Reinforced Rodmen Loc. 201 See Guajacq v. EDF, Inc. 3. Assignment to Lower-Paying Jobs in Baltimore Durant See Durant 4. Frequent Drug Testing See Durant See Camara See Durant Conclusion See See Moss

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.