CAMILO v. COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION et al, No. 1:2015cv00641 - Document 8 (D.D.C. 2015)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION accompanying final order issued separately this day. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 8/19/15.(ah)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
CAMILO v. COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION et al Doc. 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA RUFINA O. CAMILO, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 15-0641 (RC) MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending before the court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint, ECF No. 4. On June 11, 2015, plaintiff Rufina O. Camilo was ordered to respond to the motion by July 20, 2015, or risk summary dismissal of the case. See Order, ECF No. 6. Ms. Camilo has not complied with the order and has not sought additional time to do so. Hence this case will be dismissed on what is considered to be a conceded motion to dismiss. See Twelve John Does v. District of Columbia, 117 F.3d 571, 577 (D.C. Cir. 1997) (“Where the district court relies on the absence of a response as a basis for treating a motion as conceded, [the District of Columbia Circuit] honor[s] its enforcement” of the local rule.); accord Fox v. Am. Airlines, Inc., 389 F.3d 1291, 1294-95 (D.C. Cir. 2004); FDIC v. Bender, 127 F.3d 58, 67-68 (D.C. Cir. 1997). A separate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion. ________/s/____________ RUDOLPH CONTRERAS United States District Judge Date: August 19, 2015 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
